Stem Cell Blog

Употребата на матичните клетки од папочна врвца рапидно се зголемува. Пред 10 години крвта од папочна врвца можеше да лекува околу 40 состојби, но денес таа бројка е над 80. Со нетрпение очекуваме нови терапии за болести и нарушувања како што се дијабет, аутизам и мозочен удар, можете да бидете во тек со најновите случувања во регенеративната медицина на нашиот блог за матични клетки.



stem_cell_treatment_stroke_consequences-980x820-1.jpg

Key details

  • Current treatment limitations: While ischaemic strokes – which account for nearly 90% of all strokes – are currently treated with clot removal and supportive rehabilitation, there remains a significant unmet need for therapies that directly address neurological consequences.

  • Stem cell potential: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), particularly those from the umbilical cord (UC-MSCs), are a key focus in regenerative medicine due to their ability to regulate the immune system, reduce inflammation, and aid tissue regeneration.

  • Treatment development: A recent Phase 2 randomized controlled trial demonstrated that UC-MSC treatment is safe, with patients showing improvements in neurological deficits, quality of life, and functional independence compared to a control group receiving only rehabilitation.

  • Administration route: The trial compared intravenous (IV) and intrathecal (IT) (spinal canal injection) delivery methods, finding that the IV group experienced fewer procedure-related adverse events and demonstrated statistically significant improvements in functional independence earlier (at 6 months) than the IT group.

What is an ischaemic stroke?

An ischaemic stroke occurs when a clot cuts off blood flow to a part of the brain, preventing brain tissue from receiving oxygen and nutrients. This is a medical emergency, as strokes can happen suddenly and brain cells begin to die within minutes from a blockage happening.[1]

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide[2], with ischaemic strokes being the most common, accounting for just under 90% of all strokes.[1]

The consequences of stroke can be severe, and may include:

  • Paralysis

  • Sensory changes

  • Speech or language problems

  • Vision problems

  • Cognitive impairments and memory loss

  • Emotional and behavioural changes.[3]

What treatment is available for stroke and its consequences?

Immediate treatment for ischaemic stroke, provided the patient arrives at the hospital in time, can include:

  • Thrombolysis: using a clot-dissolving medication to break up clots in the brain.

  • Thrombectomy: surgical removal of the clot using a clot retrieval device.[4][5]

This is followed by treatment to reduce the risk of another stroke, such as blood-thinning medication and, potentially, surgery to remedy narrowed arteries.[5]

Treatment for stroke complications is primarily supportive, and focuses on rehabilitation and recovery. Because each stroke is unique, this can vary widely, as it will focus on relearning lost skills and enabling as independent a life as possible. It can involve physiotherapy, speech and language therapy and occupational therapy.[6][7][8]

In other words, recovery and rehabilitation treatment focuses on helping stroke patients adapt to their “new normal”, whatever that may be, leaving a significant unmet need for a treatment that could directly address the neurological consequences of a stroke.

How could stem cells help with the consequences of stroke?

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are powerful cells which can be obtained from various sources, including bone marrow, adipose (fat) tissue, the umbilical cord and the placenta. These cells have the ability to self-renew and turn into other cell types, such as bone, fat, and cartilage; they can help regulate the body’s immune system and reduce inflammation, promote the formation of new blood vessels, and can release molecules and growth factors which aid in tissue regeneration.[9]

These properties have made them a key focus of the regenerative medicine field, with numerous studies and clinical trials investigating their potential as a treatment for many illnesses and conditions which currently lack effective treatments or cures. MSCs derived from the umbilical cord (UC-MSCs), in particular, have shown in preclinical and clinical studies that they could serve as a safe and potentially effective treatment for the neurological deficits associated with ischemic stroke.[10]

In order to develop a treatment, researchers need to not only identify the best source of stem cells, but also the most appropriate dosage as well as the most effective administration method. It is in this context that a recent clinical trial comparing two different methods of administration places itself.

What were the structure and findings of the clinical trial?

The phase 2 randomised controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of UC-MSCs delivered either via IV (into a vein) or intrathecally (into the spinal canal) for treating neurological deficits after ischemic stroke.

The study involved 32 patients aged 40–75 years who were in the subacute or chronic phase of stroke recovery (7 days to 24 months post-stroke):

  • Patient groups: Patients were randomly assigned to receive UC-MSCs via IV or intrathecally (IT), in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. A control group consisting of 16 more patients was created by matching patients one-to-one with those in the intrathecal group based on gender, age, and severity of stroke consequences as determined using the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS). This control group only received rehabilitation therapy.

  • Dosage: Patients in the treatment group received a dose of 1.5 × 106 cells per kg of body weight at baseline, and then again 3 months after the first dose.

  • Rehabilitation: Standard rehabilitation therapy consisted of 30 sessions designed to improve cognitive ability, motor function, and overall quality of life, each lasting 60 minutes. The sessions were tailored to each patient and focused on physical, occupational and speech therapy.

  • Monitoring: All patients were followed for a year, with visits scheduled at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and a year.

The results:

  • Safety: There were no severe adverse events related to the treatment. Overall, the adverse event rate was lower in the IV group than in the IT group, where patients experienced more procedure-related pain and headaches.

  • Improvements at 6 months: The IV group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in neurological deficits (NIHSS scores), functional independence, and quality of life compared to the control group. The IT group also showed an improvement compared to the control group, although not as significant.

  • Improvements at 12 months: Both the IV and IT groups showed statistically significant improvements compared to the control group. Researchers hypothesised that IT administration would be more effective than IV, but the study results did not support this assumption – there was no statistically significant difference between the two methods. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results and draw more accurate conclusions.[10]

What are the next steps?

Future studies should focus on optimising the dosage and frequency of the treatment, as well as determining whether any particular patient profile benefits especially well from the treatment. Larger-scale clinical trials will also be necessary to confirm the findings of any smaller-scale trial such as this one.

This research, as well as many other such trials investigating stem cell treatments, could come to fruition during your baby’s lifetime. Having access to as many sources of stem cells as possible could be key for them to access such treatments, particularly for conditions such as stroke which can strike very suddenly. To learn more about how you could preserve a rich source of stem cells for your baby as soon as they are born, complete the form below to request our free welcome pack.

References

[1] National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (2023). What Is a Stroke? https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/stroke

[2] World Health Organization (2021). Mortality and global health estimates. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates

[3] American Stroke Association (2025). Effects of stroke. https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/effects-of-stroke

[4] American Stroke Association (2024). Ischemic Strokes (Clots). https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/types-of-stroke/ischemic-stroke-clots

[5] Stroke Association. (2024). Ischaemic stroke treatments. https://www.stroke.org.uk/stroke/types/ischaemic/treatments

[6] American Stroke Association (2024). Post-Stroke rehabilitation. https://www.stroke.org/en/life-after-stroke/stroke-rehab/post-stroke-rehabilitation

[7] Stroke Association (2024). Understanding recovery. https://www.stroke.org.uk/stroke/recovery

[8] American Stroke Association. What to Expect from Stroke Rehabilitation. https://www.stroke.org/-/media/Stroke-Files/Stroke-Resource-Center/Recovery/Patient-Focused/What-to-Expect-from-Stroke-Rehabilitation.pdf

[9] Margiana, R., et al. (2022). Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cell in regenerative medicine: a narrative review. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 13(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03054-0

[10] Nguyen, L. T., et al. (2025). Intrathecal versus intravenous umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic stroke sequelae, Stem Cells Translational Medicine, Volume 14, Issue 12, December 2025, zaf063, https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szaf063


stem_cells_charcot_marie_tooth-980x511-1.jpg

Key details

  • New trial approval: The South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety has approved a Phase 2a trial for a new umbilical cord stem cell therapy to treat Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), one of the most commonly inherited nerve diseases.[1]

  • Promising phase 1 data: In early trials, patients treated with these stem cells showed significant reductions in disease severity and improvements in gait and balance without serious adverse effects.

  • Orphan drug status: The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to this treatment, highlighting its potential value for rare diseases.

  • Future availability: The developer of the therapy, ENCell, aims for early commercialisation following the completion of the Phase 2 trial.

What is Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease?

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a group of inherited disorders that cause damage to the nerves in the arms and legs. It affects both the nerves that control movement (motor nerves) and those that transmit sensations (sensory nerves).[2][3][4]

As one of the most common types of inherited nerve diseases, CMT can be caused by mutations in a wide variety of genes. Depending on the faulty gene, CMT damages either:

  • The myelin sheath, which is the nerves’ protective coat.

  • The axons, which are the nerve fibres themselves.

Both forms of damage significantly impair nerve function.[5][6]

As an inherited condition, CMT runs through families. Most forms of CMT, including CMT1, the main form affecting the myelin sheath and the most common,[6] are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. This means someone only needs to get one copy of a faulty gene from one of their parents to develop the condition; inheritance is not connected to the two sex chromosomes, so males and females have equal chances of inheriting the condition. Occasionally, CMT will develop in someone whose family has no prior history, something known as a de novo mutation.[7][8]

CMT is a progressive condition, meaning symptoms can be subtle at first but will get progressively worse over time. Common symptoms include:

  • Mobility issues: difficulty walking, foot drop (trouble lifting the foot at the ankle), and balance issues.

  • Deformities: highly arched or very flat feet, curled toes, and muscle atrophy (shrinking) in the lower legs.

  • Chronic pain: the strain on the body caused by the problems with walking and posture often leads to muscle and joint pain.

  • Hand issues: as CMT advances, it can begin affecting the hands and arms as well, leading to reduced hand dexterity and strength, which can make daily tasks more difficult.[4][9]

There is currently no cure for CMT. Treatment is limited to supportive care and symptom management, including physiotherapy, occupational therapy, orthopaedic devices to support weakened limbs, walking aids such as walkers or wheelchairs, pain medication, and surgery to correct deformities.[3][10][11]

How can umbilical cord stem cells help treat CMT?

The stem cell therapy being trialled for CMT is based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from the Wharton’s jelly found in umbilical cord tissue.[12] Wharton’s jelly is a rich source of powerful MSCs, which, due to their young age, multiply more effectively than MSCs derived from adult tissues such as the bone marrow or fat. They can reduce inflammation, modulate the immune system, and promote healing and regeneration.[13][14]

The therapeutic mechanism involves:

  • Schwann cell support: In laboratory experiments, induced pluripotent stem cells from CMT1 patients were turned into Schwann cells, which are the cells responsible for forming the myelin sheath. Then, the Schwann cells were cultured together with WJ-MSCs, to test whether the latter would have any effect on the former. The results were very positive, showing that WJ-MSCs significantly improve Schwann cells’ ability to multiply.

  • Myelin repair: In mouse models of CMT, mice treated with WJ-MSCs had thicker myelin sheaths and a higher percentage of myelinated neurons compared to control mice.

  • Functional improvements: CMT mice treated with WJ-MSCs also showed improved grip strength and ability to walk.[15]

What do the results of the phase 1 trial for CMT show?

Data from the first-in-human, phase 1 trial of the umbilical cord stem cell therapy for CMT indicates that the treatment is both safe and potentially effective. A total of nine patients received the treatment, three at a low dose and six at a high dose. Results were promising:

  • Safety profile: No serious adverse events, toxicity, or reactions to the treatment were recorded.

  • Symptom reduction: Patients’ score on the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2 scale, which is used to gauge CMT severity, decreased by an average of 2.89 points after 16 weeks. The high-dose group saw a more marked reduction of 3.50 points.

  • Functional improvements: Patients’ gait, balance, and walking speed also improved.[16]

Following these results, the treatment received an orphan drug designation from the FDA in the in the United States.[17] A phase 1b trial testing multiple doses was already underway when the request for a phase 2 trial was placed and approved;[17][18] the newly combined phase 1b/2a trial aims to further test the treatment against a placebo to confirm its efficacy.[19]

If successful, the treatment would be the first MSC therapy for CMT in the world. ENCell, the company developing the treatment, has said it is aiming for early commercialisation and hopes to bring it to patients as soon as possible after the phase 2 trial is complete.[1] The same therapy is also being investigated for other conditions similar to CMT, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy.[20]

Why is stem cell banking so important?

Stem cell banking ensures that a child has access to their own perfectly matched stem cells, which may be critical for future regenerative therapies.

Much of the research going into stem cells could come to fruition within your baby’s lifetime, providing a cure for illnesses that are currently considered incurable. As development and research are still ongoing, different types and sources of stem cells are being trialled for effectiveness and could turn out to be the key to a specific treatment. This could have an impact on what treatments are available to your baby in the future; the more cell sources and types they have available, the greater their chances of accessing these treatments.

To learn more about stem cells from the umbilical cord and how you could preserve them for your baby’s potential future use, fill in the form below to request your free welcome pack.

References

[1] CHOSUNBIZ (2025). ENCell advances stem cell therapy for Charcot–Marie–Tooth with phase 2a approval. https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-science/2025/11/17/FC2IA63O6NGQTIE6YWPLAQDSW4/

[2] NHS (2019). Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/charcot-marie-tooth-disease/

[3] Johns Hopkins Medicine. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/charcotmarietooth-disease

[4] Mayo Clinic (2023). Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease – Symptoms and causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/charcot-marie-tooth-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20350517

[5] Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association (2025). What Is CMT? https://cmtausa.org/understanding-cmt/what-is-cmt/

[6] NHS (2019). Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease – Causes. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/charcot-marie-tooth-disease/causes/

[7] CMTUK. (2025). About CMT. https://www.cmt.org.uk/about-cmt/

[8] Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association (2025). Inheritance of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT). https://cmtausa.org/cmt-inheritance/

[9] NHS (2020). Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease – Symptoms. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/charcot-marie-tooth-disease/symptoms/

[10] NHS (2019). Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease – Treatment. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/charcot-marie-tooth-disease/treatment/

[11] Cleveland Clinic (2022). Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT): Symptoms & Treatment. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/6009-charcot-marie-tooth-disease-cmt

[12] ENCell. Pipeline. https://www.encellinc.com/en/sub/rnd/pipeline.asp

[13] Kim, D.-W., et al. (2013). Wharton’s Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Phenotypic Characterization and Optimizing Their Therapeutic Potential for Clinical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(6), pp.11692–11712. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140611692

[14] Drobiova, H., et al. (2023). Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells: a concise review of their secretome and prospective clinical applications. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1211217

[15] Oh, S.J., et al. (2024). Synergistic effect of Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells and insulin on Schwann cell proliferation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A treatment. Neurobiology of disease, 203, p.106725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106725

[16] Newswire (2024). ENCell Presents the Phase 1 Clinical Trial Results of EN001 for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease at the PNS conference. https://www.newswire.co.kr/newsRead.php?no=992387

[17] Business Wire (2025). EnCell’s EN001 Receives Orphan Drug Designation from the U.S. FDA for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250306675394/en/ENCells-EN001-Receives-Orphan-Drug-Designation-from-the-U.S.-FDA-for-Charcot-Marie-Tooth-Disease

[18] Clinicaltrials.gov (2025). Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EN001 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06328712

[19] Kyoung-Won, K. (2025). Korean-made stem cell therapy EN001 enters phase 2a trial for Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. KBR. https://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=29656

[20] Clinicaltrials.gov (2025). Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EN001 in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06328725


umbilical_cord_blood_lesch_nyhan-980x633-1.jpg

Key details

  • Understanding Lesch-Nyhan syndrome: This rare, recessive condition linked to the X chromosome primarily affects boys, and is characterised by a deficiency of the HPRT enzyme, leading to severe motor dysfunction, uric acid overproduction, and compulsive self-injury.

  • Role of HPRT: Used by the body to process and recycle purines: organic compounds that are a type of building block of DNA and RNA.

  • Promising transplant results: A recent case study demonstrated that a cord blood transplant (from a 5/6 HLA-matched donor) successfully restored HPRT1 protein levels to normal range and prevented the onset of self-injury behaviour.

  • Cord blood efficacy: Umbilical cord blood is often considered the preferred stem cell source for treating inborn errors of metabolism because it supports successful engraftment and is safer than other sources when the donor and patient are not a perfect genetic match.

What is Lesch-Nyhan syndrome?

Lesch-Nyhan syndrome is a rare condition which occurs almost exclusively in boys. It is classified as an inborn error of metabolism, meaning it is congenital (present at birth), inherited, and involves a malfunction in the body’s chemical processes (metabolism). It affects a child’s brain and behaviour, as well as causing overproduction of uric acid, a waste product which is normally eliminated through the kidneys.[1][2][3][4] Symptoms include:

  • Urate crystals: Forming in the urine due to the build-up of uric acid, these orange-coloured crystals can deposit in the diapers of babies with this condition. They are often the first symptom to appear.

  • Motor issues: These begin to manifest around four months of age, with decreased muscle tone (hypotonia) resulting in a limp, “floppy” appearance and poor head control being one of the earliest symptoms. This is followed by involuntary muscle spasms (dystonia), repetitive movements (chorea) and flailing of the limbs (ballismus), as well as muscle rigidity (spasticity). Opisthotonos, a severe muscle spasm which causes the back to arch and the head and heels to bend backwards, can also occur. Babies can miss developmental milestones such as sitting, crawling or walking; those who had previously learned to sit upright typically regress and lose the ability. Most people with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome cannot walk, are unable to sit without support, and generally use a wheelchair. Speech can be slurred or poorly articulated (dysarthria); problems with swallowing (dysphagia) can also occur.

  • Gout: The accumulation of uric acid in the joints eventually leads to recurring pain and swelling, similar to what happens in adults with gout. These episodes generally begin in the late teens to early adulthood, and can become progressively more frequent over time.

  • Intellectual disability: Some cognitive impairment is typically present, although it is hard to gauge accurately due to the motor issues and dysarthria.

  • Self injury: This compulsive behaviour is a hallmark of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, occurring in a majority of patients (about 85%), and typically begins in early childhood. It includes biting of the cheeks, lips, fingers or hands, as well as banging the head or limbs against hard objects, scratching the face, or poking at eyes.

  • Behavioural issues: Patients with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome may also have episodes in which they act aggressive and attempt to injure others, or become verbally abusive.[3][4]

What causes Lesch-Nyhan syndrome?

Lesch-Nyhan syndrome is caused by a genetic mutation, and is inherited in an X-linked recessive pattern. The affected gene, HPRT1, is located on the X chromosome; this means that females are mostly carriers as they’re often protected by an unaffected X chromosome, and males who inherit the defective chromosome from their mothers are affected by the condition. Occasionally, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome can also develop in a family with no history of it. This is known as a spontaneous, or de novo, mutation.

Whether inherited or spontaneous, the mutation results in a severe shortage or complete absence of the HPRT1 protein. The body uses this protein to process and recycle purines, organic compounds which are a type of building block of DNA and RNA. Without this protein, purines are instead broken down but not recycled, resulting in abnormally high levels of uric acid in the blood. When too much uric acid is produced, the kidneys can’t keep up, and uric acid accumulates in the body.[1][2][3][4]

It is still unclear how Lesch-Nyhan syndrome affects the brain, causing the neurological and behavioural issues associated with the condition. Researchers suspect that it may either impact the levels of dopamine, an important chemical messenger required for the brain to function correctly, or reduce the function of dopamine receptors.[2][4]

Is there a cure for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome? What treatment is available?

There is no cure for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. Treatment primarily aims to treat symptoms, and is generally handled by a team of specialists rather than a single treating physician.[2][3]

Treatment can include:

  • Allopurinol, a medication normally used for gout, to reduce the amounts of uric acid present in the body and control the symptoms caused by it.

  • Procedures to break down kidney or bladder stones.

  • Physical splints or restraints to prevent self-injury, including hip, chest and elbow restraints as well as a mouth guard.

  • Supportive equipment such as a wheelchair.[2][3]

No standard treatment is available for the neurological and behavioural symptoms of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, although a variety of medication may help ameliorate some of them.[2][3][5][6]

Could a cord blood transplant help with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome?

If performed early enough, a cord blood transplant could potentially slow or halt the progression of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. A recently published case study, detailing the results of a cord blood transplant for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, provides the strongest evidence to date for this.[7]

The patient, a boy, initially presented at six months of age with hypotonia, inability to roll over, and occasional opisthotonos. MRI and EEG results raised the suspicion of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, which was confirmed with genetic testing. Crucially, the diagnostic confirmation happened before the onset of any self-injury compulsion.

As the condition was progressing and the patient did not have a matched sibling donor, doctors made the decision to proceed with a cord blood transplant from a partially matched (5/6 HLA) donor, performed at 14 months old.

The outcome of the transplant was positive:

  • Treatment safety: 28 days post-transplant, the patient had mild graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a condition in which white blood cells remaining in the donated graft attack the cells of the host’s body. This was resolved with corticosteroids, a medication which reduces inflammation and suppresses the immune system. Beyond this, there were no complications, and the boy remained free of GvHD by the time the case report was submitted for publication.

  • Successful engraftment: Complete donor chimerism, meaning over 95% of the patient’s new blood cells were of donor origin, was achieved on day 32 post-transplant.

  • HPRT1 protein levels: Prior to the transplant, the patient’s HPRT1 protein levels were low (40.9 pg/ml) compared to those of his father and mother (98.8 pg/ml and 78.9 pg/ml respectively). Post-transplant, levels rose to 91.1 pg/ml by day 32 and remained normal (97.0 pg/ml) at day 126.

  • Neurological improvement: The patient’s dystonia and spasticity decreased, opisthotonos became more infrequent, and he had improved facial expressions, increased social interaction and developmental progress. At 36 months of age, he still showed no sign of any self-injury behaviour.[7]

This case shows a promising result, but research is still in the very early stages. Including this case, only three haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) have been performed in children with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome before the onset of the self-injury compulsion:

Endres et al. (1991) Kállay et al. (2012) Weng et al. (2025)
Patient age 16 months 24 months 14 months
Stem cell source Bone marrow Cord blood (6/6 match) Cord blood (5/6 match)
Outcome Death (day +10) Survival, full chimerism Survival, full chimerism
Long-term outcome N/A No self-injury at 5yr follow-up. Persistent motor delay. No self-injury at 36mo. Improved dystonia/social.

Thus, no formal protocol for this treatment has been established yet. Instead, until more evidence is available, the decision on whether a transplant is appropriate should be made individually for each case, by a coordinated multidisciplinary team including ethical oversight, with transparent family counselling so that informed parental consent is possible.[7]

What is known for certain is:

  • HSCT has been successfully used to treat other conditions in the inborn error of metabolism category, and is the standard of care for some of them, such as Hurler syndrome [8] and Krabbe disease.[9]

  • Cord blood is generally the preferred stem cell source for such transplants, as it increases the likelihood of full donor chimerism and is safer to use when the donor and the patient aren’t a perfect genetic match.[7][8][10]

In the case of Krabbe disease, specifically, early transplantation is of paramount importance; the sooner a transplant happens, the better the functional results for the child, with differences being noticeable even between children transplanted before 30 days of age and those transplanted after.[11] In the United States, several states have implemented newborn screening for Krabbe disease because of this. Here, too, cord blood presents itself as a superior stem cell source, as families may have previously banked the cord blood from an unaffected sibling and, if not, a matched cord blood unit may be available in a public bank.

Should a newborn screening targeted at Lesch-Nyhan syndrome be implemented, it would mean the condition could be identified before symptoms develop. The authors of this case study speculate that early transplant could prevent irreversible neuronal loss and preserve neurological potential.[7]

The importance of family banking

Storing your baby’s cord blood privately gives them access to their own perfectly matched stem cells, and a 75% chance they could be a match for a sibling who may need a transplant; comprising a 25% chance of a perfect match, and 50% chance of a partial match.

As the regenerative medicine field continues to advance, researchers are also investigating the potential of autologous stem cell treatments, using patients’ own stem cells. These would involve gene editing techniques such as CRISPR, and have already become available for some inherited conditions, such as sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia; for other conditions, including Lesch-Nyhan[12] and Krabbe disease, they are in pre-clinical or clinical trial stage. For any of these conditions, it is also possible that the most effective treatment would be a combination of cord blood transplant and gene therapy; this is currently being investigated for Krabbe disease.[13]

Should you choose to bank your baby’s cord blood, it is possible that the stem cells it contains could be used for autologous treatments, rather than more invasively collected bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. Should your baby prove to be a donor match for one of their siblings or another family member who is in need of a transplant, the cord blood could potentially also be used in that case.

To learn more about banking your baby’s cord blood, as well as about other sources of stem cells that can only be collected immediately after birth, fill in the form below to request your free guide.

References

[1] MedlinePlus. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/lesch-nyhan-syndrome/

[2] Cleveland Clinic (2022). Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome: Causes, Symptoms & Treatment. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23493-lesch-nyhan-syndrome

[3] National Organization for Rare Disorders (2015). Lesch Nyhan Syndrome. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/lesch-nyhan-syndrome/

[4] Nanagiri, A. and Shabbir, N. (2020). Lesch Nyhan Syndrome. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556079/

[5] Brainfacts.org. (2025). Lesch Nyhan Syndrome. https://www.brainfacts.org/diseases-and-disorders/neurological-disorders-az/diseases-a-to-z-from-ninds/lesch-nyhan-syndrome

[6] Nyhan, W.L. (2005). LESCH-Nyhan Disease. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 14(1), pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/096470490512490

[7] Weng, T.-F., Tin, C.-H. and Wu, K.-H. (2025). Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus. doi:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97008

[8] Tan, E.Y., Boelens, J.J., Jones, S.A. and Wynn, R.F. (2019). Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Inborn Errors of Metabolism. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00433

[9] Wright, M.D., Poe, M.D., DeRenzo, A., Haldal, S. and Escolar, M.L. (2017). Developmental outcomes of cord blood transplantation for Krabbe disease. Neurology, 89(13), pp.1365–1372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004418

[10] Aldenhoven, M. and Kurtzberg, J. (2015). Cord blood is the optimal graft source for the treatment of pediatric patients with lysosomal storage diseases: clinical outcomes and future directions. Cytotherapy, 17(6), pp.765–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.03.609

[11] Allewelt, H., Taskindoust, M., Troy, J., Page, K., Wood, S., Parikh, S., Prasad, V.K. and Kurtzberg, J. (2018). Long-Term Functional Outcomes after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Early Infantile Krabbe Disease. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 24(11), pp.2233–2238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.06.020

[12] Jang, G., Shin, H.R., Do, H.-S., Kweon, J., Hwang, S., Kim, S., Heo, S.H., Kim, Y. and Lee, B.H. (2023). Therapeutic gene correction for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome using CRISPR-mediated base and prime editing. Molecular Therapy – Nucleic Acids, 31, pp.586–595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2023.02.009

[13] ClinicalTrials.gov (2024). A Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of Intravenous Gene Transfer With an AAVrh10 Vector Expressing GALC in Krabbe Subjects Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (RESKUE). https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04693598


cord_blood_treatment_cerebral_palsy-980x653-1.jpg

A six-year-old girl named Zara has become the first child in Australia to receive an infusion of her own stored cord blood as treatment for cerebral palsy outside of a clinical trial. Experts hope that this milestone will pave the way towards broader availability, therefore removing the need for Australian children with cerebral palsy to travel elsewhere for treatment.[1]

Zara’s story 

Zara was born prematurely, and was diagnosed with cerebral palsy after she began missing milestones. Before she was born, her parents had made the decision to store her cord blood with an Australian stem cell bank, due to her mother having type 1 diabetes. After the cerebral palsy diagnosis, her parents wondered if the stored cord blood might help her.[1]

Initially, they considered travelling overseas, as cord blood treatment for cerebral palsy is not generally available in Australia. In fact, excluding Zara, only 12 other children have received this treatment, and all were part of a clinical trial. Conversely, Australian charity Cerebral Palsy Alliance (CPA) estimates that hundreds of families have had to spend tens of thousands of dollars to seek this treatment abroad.[1][2]

Planning and securing the required approvals for the treatment took more than a year. It was a coordinated group effort, involving not only Zara’s parents and her paediatric neurologist, Professor Michael Fahey, but also the stem cell bank, CPA, Melbourne’s Monash Children’s Hospital and Hudson Institute of Medical Research and several local politicians.[1]

Zara received her cord blood in April of this year, and her progress will be monitored in the months and years ahead. The biggest gains are expected between three and six months after the treatment, but Zara’s parents are already seeing improvements in her balance and movement, as well as reduced muscle stiffness. “At soccer training, she can weave between the cones easier,” her mother said. “At physio the other day, for the first time in her life, she walked up and down four steps without ­having to hold on to the rail.”[1]

What does cord blood treatment for cerebral palsy entail?

After careful thawing and preparation, the cord blood treatment is given as an infusion, through a drip into the arm. The process takes 20-30 minutes and is very similar to a standard blood transfusion.[3][1] It is believed that the cord blood treatment works by helping the brain form new pathways; these are then strengthened and refined by a cycle of rehabilitation, done after the treatment.[3] A recently-published review paper confirms, through extensive data analysis, that cord blood treatment followed by rehabilitation improves motor skills significantly more than rehabilitation alone.[4][5]

The treatment can use either autologous (the child’s own) cord blood, as in Zara’s case, or allogeneic (a donor’s). In the latter case, a sibling is often the cord blood donor. At Cells4Life, we have released six cord blood samples for treatment of a sibling with cerebral palsy, most recently in 2024; sibling donors were also used in the single clinical trial performed in Australia.[2]

Why is this treatment not more widely available?

The science supports the effectiveness of cord blood treatment for cerebral palsy, particularly in younger children as well as those with less severe forms of the condition.[4][5] However, it is not yet approved in any country, including Australia and the UK, and as such is not readily available as a therapy option. This is because large-scale phase 3 clinical trials are needed for approval, and are expensive and complicated to organise.[5]

In the meantime, outside of clinical trials, cord blood treatment for cerebral palsy is available only through expanded access or compassionate use pathways. This can require either individual approval for the treatment, as in Zara’s case, or participation in an existing expanded access programme, such as the one at Duke University in the USA.

Both of those routes to treatment are likely to require a child having access to either their own banked cord blood, or a sibling’s. This is because while there are public cord blood banks, the cord blood stored there may be available for use only for approved treatments or clinical trials.

Banking your baby’s cord blood at birth could therefore be essential to ensure access to this treatment if they, or a sibling, develop cerebral palsy. To learn more about cord blood banking, as well as other potential uses of cord blood for other diseases and conditions, fill in the form below to request your free guide.

References

[1] Booth, S. (2025). ‘Already improving’: First Aussie child receives top cerebral palsy treatment. https://www.heraldsun.com.au/health/conditions/already-improving-first-aussie-child-receives-top-cerebral-palsy-treatment/news-story/7f5e9b0bbab8bcf802aaa4e9e282d9ab

[2] Hudson Institute of Medical Research. (2025). Hudson Cell Therapies facilitates Australian first UCB stem cell treatment for cerebral palsy. https://www.hudson.org.au/news/hudson-cell-therapies-facilitates-australian-first-ucb-stem-cell-treatment-for-cerebral-palsy/

[3] Cerebral Palsy Alliance. (2025). Umbilical cord blood and cerebral palsy. https://cerebralpalsy.org.au/advocacy/umbilical-cord-blood/

[4] Finch-Edmondson, M., et al. (2025). Cord Blood Treatment for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics, 155(5), p.e2024068999. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068999

[5] Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood (2025). Cord Blood Proven Effective for Cerebral Palsy. https://parentsguidecordblood.org/en/news/cord-blood-proven-effective-cerebral-palsy


multiple-sclerosis-neurons-980x529-1.jpg

Researchers are investigating a novel placenta-derived stem cell therapy for multiple sclerosis, a currently incurable degenerative neurological condition. A recent phase 1 clinical trial, with findings published in Scientific Reports, assessed the safety and feasibility of this approach for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

What is multiple sclerosis? 

Multiple sclerosis is a lifelong condition that affects the brain and central nervous system. It is an autoimmune condition, caused by the immune system mistakenly attacking the myelin sheath which covers and protects the nerves. As a result of the myelin damage, the nerves become less efficient at sending messages to the body. The nerve damage continues to worsen over time, eventually leading to permanent disability.[1][2] Globally, multiple sclerosis affects around 2.3 million people.[3]

There are three main types of multiple sclerosis. In the relapsing-remitting type (RRMS), patients have distinct attacks (relapses) of symptoms, which then fade away partially or completely (remission). In the primary progressive type (PPMS), conversely, there is a gradual worsening of symptoms. Lastly, the secondary progressive type (SPMS) develops after RRMS for many people, and involves a gradual worsening of symptoms with or without active relapses.[4][5]

There is no cure for multiple sclerosis. Currently available treatment focuses on managing symptoms as well as reducing the seriousness and progression of the disease (disease-modifying therapies).[5][1]

Investigating stem cell therapy for multiple sclerosis

Current research is increasingly focusing on trying to find new treatments that would promote myelin regeneration (remyelination), reduce inflammation, and protect the nerves. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the potential to address these goals, thanks to their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, regenerative and neuroprotective properties. MSCs derived from the placenta (PL-MSCs), in particular, may have more potent immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects compared to other types of MSCs. What’s more, they can be obtained easily and non-invasively.[3]

Researchers posited that PL-MSCs may therefore have a positive impact on patients with SPMS, more specifically on those who no longer respond to conventional treatment (treatment-refractory).

The phase 1 clinical trial involved five patients with treatment-refractory SPMS, and was aimed primarily at determining the safety and tolerability of the PL-MSC treatment over a six-month period. Researchers also looked at exploratory secondary outcomes, including clinical disability, cognitive and psychological assessments, brain imaging (DTI and fMRI), and immunological markers.

What did the study find?

The treatment proved to be safe, with no serious complication occurring. Two patients had a mild headache, but this was resolved with a common painkiller.

Importantly, the results showed sustained improvements in clinical outcomes, with significant reductions in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, a common measure of MS disability, in the first month after the treatment. By the third month, two participants had a continued reduction in their EDSS scores, while the other three remained stable.

After the treatment, participants also improved in cognitive and psychological tests. Functional MRI analysis suggested significant enhancements in brain connectivity and cognitive function. Blood tests also showed a decrease in the number of B cells, which are immune system cells involved in multiple sclerosis. Inflammatory proteins were found to have decreased, whereas anti-inflammatory protein levels increased.

The potential of placenta stem cells

It is important to keep in mind that this was a small phase 1 trial with a very limited number of participants, no control group and a relatively short follow-up period. The results are quite encouraging, but more research and larger-scale trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of the treatment.

Nevertheless, studies like these highlight the strong potential of placenta stem cells, as well as other stem cells derived from birth-related tissues, to treat conditions and diseases that are currently considered incurable. Having ready access to a source of these powerful cells could make the difference in the future in terms of treatments that are still being discovered today. To learn more about how to bank your baby’s placenta and umbilical cord for their own future use, fill in the form below to receive your free guide.

References

[1] MS Trust (2022). What is MS? https://mstrust.org.uk/information-support/about-ms/what-is-ms

[2] Mayo Clinic (2024). Multiple Sclerosis. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/multiple-sclerosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350269

[3] Shokati, A., et al. (2025). Cell therapy with placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients in a phase 1 clinical trial. Scientific Reports, 15(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00590-6

[4] MS Society (2019). Types of MS. https://www.mssociety.org.uk/about-ms/types-of-ms

[5] NHS (2022). Multiple Sclerosis. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/multiple-sclerosis/


cord-blood-for-cerebral-palsy-980x845-1.jpg

A review paper, newly published in the prestigious Pediatrics journal, statistically demonstrates that cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy is an effective treatment to improve the motor skills of children suffering from this condition. The paper is an analysis of data from eleven studies on over 400 children with cerebral palsy.

What is cerebral palsy?

Cerebral palsy is a group of motor disorders that affect movement, posture and coordination. It’s caused by damage to the brain while it is still developing. This happens most often before birth, but sometimes during or immediately after.

The severity of the condition can vary greatly. Symptoms include lack of balance and muscle coordination, muscles that are either too stiff or too floppy, exaggerated reflexes, and issues with walking, eating and speech.[1][2]

There is currently no cure for cerebral palsy. Available treatment includes physiotherapy, occupational therapy, medication and sometimes surgery. This is aimed at helping people with the condition to be as healthy and independent as possible.[3]

What did the analysis find? 

According to the analysis results, children who underwent cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy combined with rehabilitation saw a significantly greater improvement in gross motor skills compared to those gained from rehabilitation alone. The improvements reached their peak between 6 and 12 months after the cord blood therapy; the data also indicates that higher cell doses per kg of patient weight result in bigger improvements. This is consistent with the current hypothesis that the treatment works by reducing inflammation in the brain and stimulates tissue repair, leading to improvements in brain connectivity.[4][5]

After six to twelve months, the majority (68%) of children who underwent cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy scored higher on the gross motor function measure scale used for cerebral palsy (GMFM-66) than the entire control group. The analysis did, however, also find that the treatment had better results in younger children, as well as those with less severe cerebral palsy. Overall, the children who saw the best results were those under the age of 5 who had some ability to walk, whether unaided or with support, before the therapy.[4][5]

What does this mean for the treatment of cerebral palsy?

Cerebral palsy remains one of the most common motor disorders in childhood. It can be accurately diagnosed as early as 6 months of age, which is well within the bracket of highest therapy effectiveness identified by the analysis. What’s more, the sooner a child is treated, the better. This is because a single unit of cord blood will result in a higher cell dose per kg when a child is still small, and may even be enough for multiple treatments.[4]

At the present time, cord blood therapy is not approved as a treatment for CP in any country. This is due to it still requiring large-scale, phase 3 trials before it can reach this approval. Therefore, it is only available through clinical trials as well as expanded access or compassionate use programmes.[4]

This lack of approval means that, although there are cord blood units available for use in public banks, it may not be possible to use these for treatment in the immediate without gaining access to a clinical trial. Even then, the clinical trial may require the cord blood used in the treatment to be autologous (the child’s own), or to come from a sibling donor. Expanded access programmes may also have the same requirements.

A child having access to their own banked cord blood, or a sibling’s, could therefore be essential to ensure treatment can happen during the window of opportunity that could achieve the best results. To learn more about how you could preserve this important health resource for your child and your family, fill in the form below to request your free Parents’ Guide to Cord Blood Banking.

References

[1] Mayo Clinic (2023). Cerebral palsy – symptoms and causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cerebral-palsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20353999

[2] NHS (2023). Overview – Cerebral Palsy. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cerebral-palsy/

[3] NHS (2023). Treatment – Cerebral palsy. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cerebral-palsy/treatment/

[4] Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood (2025). Cord Blood Proven Effective for Cerebral Palsy. https://parentsguidecordblood.org/en/news/cord-blood-proven-effective-cerebral-palsy

[5] Finch-Edmondson, M., et al. Cord Blood Treatment for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 2025; e2024068999. 10.1542/peds.2024-068999.


cell-therapy-for-cerebral-palsy-980x588-1.jpg

A new study on cell therapy for cerebral palsy has, for the first time, directly compared the efficacy of two different treatments. Although more research is needed, the study’s results offer valuable insights for future clinical trials tackling this challenging disorder.

The challenges of cell therapy for cerebral palsy 

Over the past two decades, cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for cerebral palsy. In particular, mononuclear cells from cord blood (UCB-MNCs) and mesenchymal stem cells from cord tissue (UCT-MSCs) have proven to be a safe and effective therapy. Many clinical trials have obtained results showing improvements in patients’ motor function through these cells’ anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and regenerative properties.

However, efforts to pinpoint the best treatment method have been stymied by significant variations in trial parameters. Differences from study to study can include the type and severity of cerebral palsy, the age of the patients, the cell type, dose and delivery method, whether the study is open-label or blinded, and even the methods and time periods used to monitor improvement. Consequently, no two studies are alike, and results cannot be directly compared.[1][2]

Study methods and goal

The new study, conducted in Iran, is a pooled analysis of the results of two studies, one on UCB-MNTs and one on UCT-MSCs. Both studies were conducted in the same research centre; moreover, to aid in the comparison, the research methodology and other variables were kept the same as much as possible.[3][4][5]

The study patients were aged 4-14 and had spastic cerebral palsy with white matter lesions. After eligibility screening, 108 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms or a control group. Treatment was done via intrathecal (into the spinal fluid) injection, with the control group receiving a sham procedure instead. Researchers then assessed patients’ motor function, quality of life, disability and spasticity after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Both individual studies were double-blinded. Furthermore, all statistical analysis, both for individual studies and for the final pooled comparison, was performed by a blinded statistician.

The individual studies aimed to confirm that UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs are a safe and effective treatment for cerebral palsy. Following that, the pooled study analysis compared the effects of the UCB-MNC treatment to those of the UCT-MSC treatment across the study period.

Study results

Both the UCB-MNC treatment and the UCT-MSC treatment reported positive results over time when compared to the control group. Patients in both groups showed improvement in gross motor function and quality of life, as well as reduction in disability and spasticity.[4][5]

A graph showing outcomes of cell therapy for cerebral palsy.
Figure 1. A comparison graph of the two different treatment groups and the control group.[3]

As the figure above shows, researchers found that the UCB-MNC treatment group showed stronger improvements in motor function early on. However, both the UCB-MNC and UCT-MSC groups achieved the same level of improvement at 6 months post treatment. At twelve months after treatment, there was some gradual deterioration of the improvements; however, researchers noted that UCT-MSCs did seem to result in more sustainable changes, with patients seeing less deterioration compared to the UCB-MNC group.[3]

Due to this deterioration, researchers posit that repeated doses at regular intervals may be the best route to continued improvement.[1] They also suggest that future trials should investigate treatments combining both UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs, as it may prove more effective than individual ones.[3]

The future of medicine

Researchers stress that this study is only a start, and further comparative trials and research are needed. Although both UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs offer positive results, there is still no certainty on which cell type and source will prove most effective treatment. This is true not only for cerebral palsy, but also for other illnesses and diseases for which an effective treatment is still being sought.

This uncertainty highlights the importance of comprehensive stem cell banking. By storing as many stem cell sources as possible, you could equip your baby and family with the broadest range of options for future regenerative therapies.

To find out how you could preserve both cord blood and tissue, along with amnion and placenta, for your baby’s potential future use, fill in the form below to request your free guide.

References

[1] Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood. (2025). Cerebral Palsy Response to Cell Therapy as a Function of Time. https://parentsguidecordblood.org/en/news/cerebral-palsy-response-cell-therapy-function-time

[2] Qu, J., et al. (2022). Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1006845

[3] Nouri, M., et al. (2025). Cell-Based Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Puzzle in Progress. PubMed, 26(9), pp.569–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2024.2032098.1600

[4] Amanat, M., et al. (2021). Clinical and imaging outcomes after intrathecal injection of umbilical cord tissue mesenchymal stem cells in cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 12(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02513-4.

[5] Zarrabi, M., et al. (2022). The safety and efficacy of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. BMC Neurology, 22(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02636-y.


stroke_in_the_brain-980x918-1.jpg

A recent study has found that a stem cell therapy could reduce epileptic symptoms after stroke and help the brain recover. The study was performed at the Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease in California, USA, using a rat model of stroke.

Stroke basics

A stroke is a medical condition which causes the death of cells in the brain. This, in turn, stops the brain from working properly. There are two main types of stroke: haemorrhagic, caused by bleeding in the brain, and ischemic, caused by the blockage of a blood vessel. Ischemic stroke is by far the most common, accounting for just under 90% of strokes.[1]

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and one of the major causes of disability worldwide.[2] In the UK, it is the single biggest cause of severe disability, causing a range greater than any other condition, including movement issues, visual problems, and speech difficulties.[3]

The goal of the study

The stem cell therapy tested in the study is based on mesenchymal stem cells derived from donor bone marrow. It has already been successful in clinical trials for improving chronic paralysis after traumatic brain injury[4][5]; this led to its approval as a treatment for this issue in Japan[6].

Now, researchers are hoping it could also help reverse brain damage caused by stroke. In particular, they are focusing on brain hyperexcitability, which is a flawed response in the brain that develops in some people after they have had a stroke.

What is brain hyperexcitability?

Put simply, brain hyperexcitability is an increased chance for neurons to activate in response to a specific stimulus. In the case of stroke, this flawed response develops in the brain as it tries to make up for lost functions.

These overly active neurons send out signals that are too frequent or too strong to other regions of the brain. This, in turn, causes serious issues. Brain hyperexcitability can make it difficult to control muscles (spasticity) and can lead to seizures.[7] This means stroke is a leading cause of acquired epilepsy,[8] particularly in people over the age of 35.[9]

Unfortunately, brain hyperexcitability remains not well understood, and there is no treatment available to prevent it[7]. Post-stroke seizures and epilepsy are simply managed, as and when needed, with anti-epileptic drugs.[10]

Study process and findings

Researchers tested the stem cell therapy in a rat model of stroke. A month after rats had a stroke, modified human stem cells were injected into their brains, near the damaged area.

The team then measured electrical activity in the brain to determine the effectiveness of the therapy. Furthermore, they also analysed the structure of the brain and blood cells in detail, so they could study the changes wrought by the stroke and by the therapy.

They found that the stroke had caused hyperexcitability in the rats’ brains. The stem cell therapy, however, had reversed this, returning the brain to normal function. Furthermore, a number of proteins and cells that are important for brain function had also increased.

Additionally, by comparing rats which had received the therapy to control rats, researchers identified molecules in the blood that had changed after the stroke. They further saw that these same molecules were restored to normal by the therapy. Additional analysis found that a week after the transplant, few stem cells remained in the rats’ brain; however, the effects were long-lasting.

Hope for future treatment

This therapy is in the very early stages of research; it remains to be determined whether the reversal of brain hyperexcitability would lead to a reduction of symptoms in actual patients.

Still, studies like these highlight the tremendous regenerative potential of stem cells, and the hope they can offer for the treatment of illnesses and injuries that today are considered incurable.

Today, stroke occurs more than 100,000 times per year in the UK – about once every five minutes. Advances in immediate treatment have meant that the number of patients dying from stroke continues to decrease. Unfortunately, however, rehabilitation hasn’t kept pace, and the number of people living with severe disabilities after stroke continues to increase.[3]

Stem cell therapies for post-stroke disability could prove to be truly lifechanging.

Some of the most potent stem cells that could be used in regenerative therapy come your baby’s umbilical cord and placenta. Both of these are normally thrown away at birth – but they could instead be stored for your baby’s future use. If you want to find out more about this rich source of stem cells, and learn how you could preserve it, fill out the form below to download our free parent’s guide.

References

[1] National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (2023). Stroke – What Is a Stroke? https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/stroke

[2] Katan, M. and Luft, A. (2018). Global Burden of Stroke. Seminars in Neurology, [online] 38(02), pp.208–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503

[3] Brain Research UK (2021). Stroke – Neurological condition. https://www.brainresearchuk.org.uk/neurological-conditions/stroke

[4] Kawabori, M. et al. (2021). Cell Therapy for Chronic TBI. Neurology, 96(8), pp.e1202–e1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000011450

[5] Okonkwo, D.O. et al. (2024). Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Implants for Chronic Motor Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Neurology, [online] 103(7), p.e209797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209797

[6] Neuro Central. (2024). SanBio Obtains Marketing Approval for ‘AKUUGO® Suspension for Intracranial Implantation’ (INN: Vandefitemcel) as a Therapeutic Agent for Improving Chronic Motor Paralysis From Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). https://www.neuro-central.com/sanbio-obtains-marketing-approval-for-akuugo-suspension-for-intracranial-implantation-inn-vandefitemcel-as-a-therapeutic-agent-for-improving-chronic-motor-paralysis-from-tra/

[7] Klein, B. et al. (2024). Modified human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells restore cortical excitability after focal ischemic stroke in rats. Molecular Therapy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.12.006

[8] Adhikari, Y., Ma, C.-G., Chai, Z. and Jin, X. (2023). Preventing development of post-stroke hyperexcitability by optogenetic or pharmacological stimulation of cortical excitatory activity. Neurobiology of Disease, 184, p.106233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106233

[9] Mayo Clinic (2021). Epilepsy – Symptoms and Causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/epilepsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20350093

[10] Holtkamp, M., Beghi, E., Benninger, F., Kälviäinen, R., Rocamora, R. and Christensen, H. (2017). European Stroke Organisation guidelines for the management of post-stroke seizures and epilepsy. European Stroke Journal, 2(2), pp.103–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987317705536


world_ms_day-980x653-1.jpg

The results reported from Phase II of the first FDA-approved trial for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using stem cells are highly promising, suggesting that stem cells could be a viable treatment option to help improve the lives of those with the condition. [1]

What is the MS trial?

The Phase II trial, which was carried out by The Tisch MS Research Center of New York, constitutes the next stage in the development of the groundbreaking research signalled by the results from Phase I, the first FDA-approved trial to explore the injection of stem cells for MS.

The Phase II trial involved 54 patients split between a test group and a control group in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Members of each group received 6 injections of either autologous (meaning their own) mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors (MSC-NPs) or saline placebo every two months.

These injections were administered into the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients.

The study utilised a cross-over model by which patients who received the stem cell injections in year 1 were then given the saline placebo in year 2 and vice versa.

How does the stem cell treatment work?

Building on their findings from Phase I, researchers identified MSC-NPs for the treatment having ascertained that they promote tissue regeneration and immunomodulatory effects, in addition to being safe and well tolerated. [2]

MSC-NPs are a subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells that can upregulate growth factors like hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and minimise ectopic differentiation – essentially, the abnormal differentiation of cells.

By injecting them into the cerebrospinal fluid – a process called intrathecal (IE) injection – researchers found in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE – an accepted way of modelling the effects of MS) mouse model that MSC-NPs were associated with increased spinal cord myelination, neurological recovery and reduced immune infiltration into the central nervous system. [3]

What were the results?

The results of the Phase II trial demonstrated huge promise for the use of stem cells in treating MS.

Patients requiring walking assistance saw significant improvements in both a timed 25-foot walk test and a 6 minute walking test than those in the control group.

Additionally, treatment recipients demonstrated improved bladder function, with 69% showing improvements in post-void residual volume.

Amongst the other findings were indicators that these stem cells could be helping to restore neuronal cells and reverse cognitive decline in patients with less advanced disease progression.

Furthermore, the stem cell treatment occasioned notable biomarker changes in cerebro-spinal fluid, especially with regards to the decreased levels of CCL2, a protein associated with inflammation, and the increased levels of MMP9, an indicator of the increased presence of reparative cells. [4]

Overall these findings are extremely promising, indicating that stem cells could be used in future treatments that may help to reverse many of the most debilitating aspects of multiple sclerosis, like disability.

The next stage in the study will be for researchers to investigate the effects of increasing the stem cell dosage.

What does this mean for cord blood banking?

This trial is just the latest example of the regenerative potential stem cells have to help treat life-changing conditions like MS.

As exemplified by this study, mesenchymal stem cells in particular, with their immunomodulatory and tissue repair properties, are especially promising.

Incredibly, the umbilical cord and placenta are one of the richest sources of these stem cells, but are routinely thrown away after birth.

By saving these for your baby, you could be giving them the key to future therapies for everything from cancer and stroke to diabetes and heart disease.

The potential offered by stem cells is vast, but you only get one chance to save baby’s stem cells, and that’s the day they’re born.

To find out more about cord blood banking and how it could protect your family’s health, fill out the form below to request a free Welcome Pack.

References

[1] FDA-Approved Phase II Stem Cell Treatment Trial Shows Significant and Diverse Improvements for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients. Tisch MS Research Centre of New York. https://www.tischms.org/phase-ii-analysis-results

[2] Harris, Violaine K. et al. (2018) Phase I Trial of Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Neural Progenitors in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. eBioMedicine, Volume 29, 23 – 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.02.002

[3] Harris, Violaine K. et al. (2012) Clinical and pathological effects of intrathecal injection of mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Volume 313, Issue 1, 167 – 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.08.036

[4] Harris, V.K., Stark, J., Williams, A. et al. (2024) Efficacy of intrathecal mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitor therapy in progressive MS: results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther 15, 151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03765-6


krabbe_disease_1440-980x613-1.jpg

A new therapy, recently granted a UK Innovation Passport Designation, could help to improve treatment outcomes for Krabbe disease patients post-stem cell transplant.

What is Krabbe disease?

Krabbe disease is a rare genetic disorder affecting around 1 in every 100,000 births and is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme galactocerebrosidase (GALC), leading to the breakdown of the myelin in the nervous system.

The most common variant of Krabbe disease, Infant Krabbe Disease, affects children under the age of 1, and can cause muscle stiffness, seizures, and developmental delays. It is often fatal if untreated.

Approximately 85% of Krabbe disease cases are the infantile subtypes. [1]

What are the current treatment options for Krabbe disease?

Currently, the only effective treatment option for Krabbe disease is a transplant of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are found in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood. [2]

By transplanting HSCs from a donor to a Krabbe disease patient, the patient’s unhealthy cells lacking in the GALC enzyme are eventually replaced by healthy red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets derived from HSCs.

These healthy blood cells can then work to populate the brain with GALC enzyme activity, reducing the breakdown of myelin and thereby stabilise cognitive function. [3]

Stem cell transplants using haematopoietic stem cells from cord blood, specifically, have been shown to be highly effective in improving neurological outcomes if the transplant is performed before the development of symptoms. [4]

While HSCT remains the only viable treatment option for Krabbe disease, it is not a cure.

It also does not combat the peripheral neuropathy occasioned by Krabbe disease, a condition affecting the nerves beyond the brain and spinal cord, leading to decline in motor function. [5]

What is the new gene therapy and how does it improve stem cell transplant outcomes?

Developed by Forge Biologics, the FBX-101 therapy works by delivering a copy of the GALC gene to cells in the nervous system, which improves myelination (the process by which the myelin sheath forms) and, crucially, motor function.

It is designed to be administered intravenously after the current standard of care, a haematopoietic stem cell transplant.

In its early phase trial, REKLAIM, FBX-101 was shown to improve motor function in all five of the patients who underwent treatment.

Building on these promising results, the Innovation Passport designation means that FBX-101 will be able to enter the Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP), which accelerates both market and regulatory access in the UK. [6]

Why is newborn screening for Krabbe disease so important?

Newborn screening for Krabbe disease is crucial because the condition progresses rapidly, especially in its infantile form, and early intervention is the key to preventing severe neurological damage.

Ideally, the patient would receive a transplant within 30 days in order to have the best chance of improved neurological and transplant outcomes. [7]

Symptoms of Krabbe disease often appear within the first few months of life, and once they start, the deterioration of the nervous system is fast and irreversible.

By the time symptoms are noticeable, significant damage has already occurred, limiting the effectiveness of available treatments.

Newborn screening allows for early diagnosis before symptoms develop, enabling early intervention through HSCT, which is at its most effective if administered before significant damage to the nervous system. [8]

Could cord blood banking help?

Umbilical cord blood is a vital source of haematopoietic stem cells which can differentiate into various kinds of blood cells. These cells are crucial in the treatment of Krabbe disease, but rely on finding a donor match in order for a transplant to be successful.

If Krabbe disease runs in your family, saving cord blood for every child is probably a worthwhile investment.

If your baby does end up developing Krabbe disease, having their sibling’s stem cells in storage could make the difference in being able to access a life-saving transplant as a sibling has a 75% chance of being a partial donor match.

For more information about how cord blood banking could help with the treatment of Krabbe disease, visit our Krabbe Disease and Stem Cells page, here.

If either you or a family member or someone you know is expecting, why not download our free Welcome Pack to learn more about the benefits of cord blood banking. Simply fill out the form below.

References

[1] Isabel C. Yoon, Nicholas A. Bascou, Michele D. Poe, Paul Szabolcs, Maria L. Escolar; Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for late-infantile Krabbe disease. Blood 2021; 137 (13): 1719–1730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020005477

[2] Isabel C. Yoon, Nicholas A. Bascou, Michele D. Poe, Paul Szabolcs, Maria L. Escolar; Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for late-infantile Krabbe disease. Blood 2021; 137 (13): 1719–1730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020005477

[3] (2022, August 13). Krabbe Disease (Globoid Cell Leukodystrophy). Cleveland Clinic. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/6039-krabbe-disease-globoid-cell-leukodystrophy

[4] Wright, M. D., Poe, M. D., DeRenzo, A., Haldal, S., & Escolar, M. L. (2017). Developmental outcomes of cord blood transplantation for Krabbe disease: A 15-year study. Neurology, 89(13), 1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004418

[5] Beltran-Quintero, M.L., Bascou, N.A., Poe, M.D. et al. Early progression of Krabbe disease in patients with symptom onset between 0 and 5 months. Orphanet J Rare Dis 14, 46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1018-4

[6] (2024, March 19). Forge Biologics’ Novel AAV Gene Therapy FBX-101 for Patients with Krabbe Disease is Granted UK’s Innovation Passport Designation. Forge Biologics. https://www.forgebiologics.com/forge-biologics-novel-aav-gene-therapy-fbx-101-for-patients-with-krabbe-disease-is-granted-uks-innovation-passport-designation/

[7] Page, K. M., Ream, M. A., Rangarajan, H. G., Galindo, R., Mian, A. Y., Ho, M. L., Provenzale, J., Gustafson, K. E., Rubin, J., Shenoy, S., & Kurtzberg, J. (2022). Benefits of newborn screening and hematopoietic cell transplant in infantile Krabbe disease. Blood advances, 6(9), 2947–2956. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006094

[8] Page, K. M., Ream, M. A., Rangarajan, H. G., Galindo, R., Mian, A. Y., Ho, M. L., Provenzale, J., Gustafson, K. E., Rubin, J., Shenoy, S., & Kurtzberg, J. (2022). Benefits of newborn screening and hematopoietic cell transplant in infantile Krabbe disease. Blood advances, 6(9), 2947–2956. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006094