Stem Cell Blog

Употребата на матичните клетки од папочна врвца рапидно се зголемува. Пред 10 години крвта од папочна врвца можеше да лекува околу 40 состојби, но денес таа бројка е над 80. Со нетрпение очекуваме нови терапии за болести и нарушувања како што се дијабет, аутизам и мозочен удар, можете да бидете во тек со најновите случувања во регенеративната медицина на нашиот блог за матични клетки.



epidermolysis-bullosa-980x653-1.jpg

Positive early results have emerged from a clinical trial testing an umbilical cord tissue stem cell therapy for epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a currently incurable group of disorders which causes extremely fragile skin. The therapy has shown promise in relieving symptoms and reducing disease activity in children with a severe form of EB.[1]

What is epidermolysis bullosa? 

EB is a group of inherited genetic disorders that results in easy blistering of the skin and, in many cases, mucous membranes, such as the lining inside the mouth. With EB, painful blisters or open sores will form with even the slightest friction, even from seemingly trivial things such as clothes rubbing against the skin.

This extreme skin weakness means that everyday things most of us don’t think about can be very difficult and painful for people with EB. What’s more, there is currently no cure available for EB.[2] Because of this, patients and their families have to be constantly careful, avoiding anything that might hurt the skin as much as possible. Dealing with the blisters and sores that do happen, to avoid them spreading further or causing infections, is also a painful, time-consuming daily task.[3] The blisters need to be lanced and dressed, in order to avoid them causing larger, painful wounds that take a long time to heal.[2] Itching is also very common, with patients describing an unbearable, constant itch. Moreover, relief from the itching is difficult, as scratching, too, can tear the skin, create blisters and make existing wounds worse.[4]

Depending on the type of EB and severity of the disease, sufferers may be left with deformities from scar tissue, such as fused fingers or toes, and limited motion. If blisters form inside the mouth or in the oesophagus, eating can also become an issue. Skin cancer and sepsis are potentially lethal consequences.[5]

There are four main types of EB, varying in severity: EB simplex, dystrophic EB, junctional EB and Kindler syndrome.[3] Among these, recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) is one of the most severe types, and in fact one of the most severe hereditary genetic disorders as a whole[6]. In other words, as the name implies, it is recessively inherited, with two parents who are both asymptomatic carriers of the disease having a one in four chance of having a child affected by it.[7] Patients with this type of EB also have a higher chance of developing skin cancer, and their life expectancy is just age 30.[8]

Trial structure and objectives

The study on the cord tissue stem cell therapy for EB, called MissionEB, focused on children with the two most severe types of RDEB, designated “intermediate” and “severe” in disease classification. It was led by the EB team at Great Ormond Street Hospital[1], one of the four centres of excellence for EB treatment in the UK[9].

A prior small-scale clinical trial had found benefits from a therapy consisting of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow, with effects lasting 3-6 months.[10] Following this, researchers posited that MSCs derived from umbilical cord tissue (UC-MSCs) could prove more effective.[11] Therefore, the study aimed at testing whether repeated doses of UC-MSCs could be a safe and effective treatment for severe RDEB.

The study enrolled 30 children, and was a randomised, placebo controlled, double blinded cross-over trial. In other words, patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or placebo group. Furthermore, neither the patients nor the researchers were aware which study group each patient was in. After an initial assessment at 9 months, groups were then switched, with the original treatment group receiving placebo and vice versa.[11][12]

Preliminary results of the study show that the treatment improved patients’ quality of life, reducing itch and pain. The range of improvements was broader for patients with less severe RDEB; children younger than 10 also saw improved skin integrity and reduced disease activity. In interviews, both the children and their care givers correctly identified whether they were receiving the treatment or the placebo.[11][1]

An open-label extension study is now ongoing. In this study, patients who completed the original MissionEB trial will receive three cycles of the treatment, at zero, four, and eight months. The severity of their disease will then be assessed at four, eight, and twelve months.[1]

The future of cord tissue stem cell therapy for EB

Following an agreement with Great Ormond Street Hospital for use of the data, biotechnology company Inmune Bio is marketing the treatment as CORDStrom. The company intends to seek approval for the treatment in the US, UK and EU in the nearby future.[11]

At Cells4Life, we have previously released a cord tissue sample for the treatment of epidermolysis bullosa. More in general, studies like these show the incredible potential of umbilical cord stem cells as treatment for rare, disabling diseases. To learn more about how you could preserve these powerful stem cells for your baby and family, fill in the form below to receive your free guide to cord blood banking.

References

[1] Bryson, S. (2025). Stem cell therapy seen to reduce itch, pain in RDEB children in trial. Epidermolysis Bullosa News. https://epidermolysisbullosanews.com/news/stem-cell-therapy-reduces-itch-pain-rdeb-children-trial/

[2] NHS (2021). Treatment – Epidermolysis bullosa. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/epidermolysis-bullosa/treatment/

[3] Bionews Staff (2017). What Is Epidermolysis Bullosa? https://epidermolysisbullosanews.com/what-is-epidermolysis-bullosa/

[4] Danial, C., et al. (2014). Prevalence and Characterization of Pruritus in Epidermolysis Bullosa. Pediatric Dermatology, 32(1), pp.53–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12391

[5] Mellerio, J.E., et al. (2025). Milestone events in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB): findings of the PEBLES Study. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf009

[6] Soro, L., Bartus, C. and Purcell, S. (2015). Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Review of Disease Pathogenesis and Update on Future Therapies. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 8(5), p.41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4445895/

[7] DEBRA UK. (2024). Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). https://www.debra.org.uk/get-support/eb-support-and-resources/about-eb-debra-uk/dystrophic-epidermolysis-bullosa/

[8] EB Research Partnership. (2025). Dystrophic EB (DEB). https://www.ebresearch.org/dystrophic.html

[9] DEBRA UK. (2025). NHS specialist EB healthcare. https://www.debra.org.uk/get-support/eb-support-and-resources/eb-professionals/specialist-eb-healthcare/

[10] Petrof, G., et al. (2015). Potential of Systemic Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy for Children with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 135(9), pp.2319–2321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.158

[11] Cure EB. (2025). Mission EB. https://cure-eb.org/research-portfolio/mission-eb/

[12] ISRCTN. (2025). Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for children with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14409785


cord-blood-for-cerebral-palsy-980x845-1.jpg

A review paper, newly published in the prestigious Pediatrics journal, statistically demonstrates that cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy is an effective treatment to improve the motor skills of children suffering from this condition. The paper is an analysis of data from eleven studies on over 400 children with cerebral palsy.

What is cerebral palsy?

Cerebral palsy is a group of motor disorders that affect movement, posture and coordination. It’s caused by damage to the brain while it is still developing. This happens most often before birth, but sometimes during or immediately after.

The severity of the condition can vary greatly. Symptoms include lack of balance and muscle coordination, muscles that are either too stiff or too floppy, exaggerated reflexes, and issues with walking, eating and speech.[1][2]

There is currently no cure for cerebral palsy. Available treatment includes physiotherapy, occupational therapy, medication and sometimes surgery. This is aimed at helping people with the condition to be as healthy and independent as possible.[3]

What did the analysis find? 

According to the analysis results, children who underwent cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy combined with rehabilitation saw a significantly greater improvement in gross motor skills compared to those gained from rehabilitation alone. The improvements reached their peak between 6 and 12 months after the cord blood therapy; the data also indicates that higher cell doses per kg of patient weight result in bigger improvements. This is consistent with the current hypothesis that the treatment works by reducing inflammation in the brain and stimulates tissue repair, leading to improvements in brain connectivity.[4][5]

After six to twelve months, the majority (68%) of children who underwent cord blood therapy for cerebral palsy scored higher on the gross motor function measure scale used for cerebral palsy (GMFM-66) than the entire control group. The analysis did, however, also find that the treatment had better results in younger children, as well as those with less severe cerebral palsy. Overall, the children who saw the best results were those under the age of 5 who had some ability to walk, whether unaided or with support, before the therapy.[4][5]

What does this mean for the treatment of cerebral palsy?

Cerebral palsy remains one of the most common motor disorders in childhood. It can be accurately diagnosed as early as 6 months of age, which is well within the bracket of highest therapy effectiveness identified by the analysis. What’s more, the sooner a child is treated, the better. This is because a single unit of cord blood will result in a higher cell dose per kg when a child is still small, and may even be enough for multiple treatments.[4]

At the present time, cord blood therapy is not approved as a treatment for CP in any country. This is due to it still requiring large-scale, phase 3 trials before it can reach this approval. Therefore, it is only available through clinical trials as well as expanded access or compassionate use programmes.[4]

This lack of approval means that, although there are cord blood units available for use in public banks, it may not be possible to use these for treatment in the immediate without gaining access to a clinical trial. Even then, the clinical trial may require the cord blood used in the treatment to be autologous (the child’s own), or to come from a sibling donor. Expanded access programmes may also have the same requirements.

A child having access to their own banked cord blood, or a sibling’s, could therefore be essential to ensure treatment can happen during the window of opportunity that could achieve the best results. To learn more about how you could preserve this important health resource for your child and your family, fill in the form below to request your free Parents’ Guide to Cord Blood Banking.

References

[1] Mayo Clinic (2023). Cerebral palsy – symptoms and causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cerebral-palsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20353999

[2] NHS (2023). Overview – Cerebral Palsy. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cerebral-palsy/

[3] NHS (2023). Treatment – Cerebral palsy. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cerebral-palsy/treatment/

[4] Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood (2025). Cord Blood Proven Effective for Cerebral Palsy. https://parentsguidecordblood.org/en/news/cord-blood-proven-effective-cerebral-palsy

[5] Finch-Edmondson, M., et al. Cord Blood Treatment for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 2025; e2024068999. 10.1542/peds.2024-068999.


lymphoma_lymph_node-980x653-1.jpg

A phase 1 trial of a novel cell therapy for lymphoma that is highly resistant to standard treatment (highly refractory lymphoma) has published very positive results in the Nature Medicine journal. The therapy, which uses natural killer (NK) cells derived from cord blood, resulted in complete remission in two thirds of the treated patients.

What are natural killer cells? 

NK cells are a specific type of white blood cell, a part of the immune system which targets and destroys infected and cancerous cells. These cells patrol the body, determining which cells should be destroyed based on whether they receive the correct signals from them or not.[1]

Their ability to kill cancerous cells makes NK cells ideal for the development of cell therapies to treat cancer. These typically hinge on modifying the NK cells, granting them the ability to recognise and destroy cancerous cells they would otherwise ignore.[2] Such is the case for this novel cord blood cell therapy for lymphoma, a type of blood cancer which affects lymphocytes, white blood cells which are part of the immune system. Normally, lymphocytes help the body fight off infection. With lymphoma, however, they do not work correctly and can multiply out of control, accumulating quickly in lymph nodes and other organs in the lymphatic system, such as the spleen and liver.[3][4]

Thanks to advances in medicine, lymphoma is generally considered a very treatable type of cancer, with 5-year survival rates averaging between 74% and 89% depending on the type of lymphoma.[5][6][7] However, sometimes the cancer still resists treatment or reoccurs afterwards, leaving patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma with few options and a poor prognosis.[8] This can happen in between 10%-40% of cases, depending on the type of lymphoma, the patient age at diagnosis, and how advanced the disease was at diagnosis.[9][10] This is the need this cord blood cell therapy for lymphoma is attempting to fill.

What does the new therapy entail?

Researchers first isolated NK cells from cord blood and then activated them using a combination of cytokines.[8] Cytokines are proteins which the immune system uses to send signals;[11] using them to activate NK cells stimulates their cancer-fighting abilities.[12]

Then, the antibody AFM13 was added to the NK cells, enabling them to target the CD30 protein. This protein is found on the surface of cancerous cells in specific types of lymphoma, primarily in Hodgkin lymphoma but also other varieties.[8]

Following chemotherapy, doctors infused a dose of the treated NK cells into patients. This was then followed by three doses of the AFM13 antibody, administered once a week.

Why is this therapy so important?

The 42 patients who took part in the trial all had highly refractory lymphoma, having received a median of seven prior treatment courses. In spite of this, the therapy achieved an overall response rate of 92.9%, with 66.7% of patients experiencing complete remission. In patients with Hodgkin lymphoma specifically, the rates were even higher, with a complete remission rate of 73% and an overall response rate of 97.3%.

Eleven patients remained in complete remission for at least 14 months, with this lasting, for some, up to 40 months after receiving the therapy. Five patients remained in complete remission without any further treatment, and six went on to receive a stem cell transplant.

At a median follow-up of 20 months, the therapy led to complete disease remission in 26.2% patients, or about one in four patients. The two-year overall survival rate was 76.2%.[8] These are encouraging and very positive results, particularly considering how resistant their cancer had been to previous treatment. Moreover, the therapy proved to be safe and well-tolerated, with no adverse side effects beyond those caused by the chemotherapy.

This trial was a small-scale one, primarily aimed at confirming the safety of the treatment and determining an optimal dose. Larger trials are therefore needed before this therapy can become available to patients.

Still, trials like this, as well as many others currently ongoing, highlight the strong curative potential of cord blood cells. To discover more about cord blood cells, and find out how you could preserve them for your baby and family’s potential future use, fill in the form below to request our free guide.

References

[1] Cleveland Clinic (2023). What Are Natural Killer Cells (NK Cells)? https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/24898-natural-killer-cells

[2] Eissmann, P. (2016). Natural Killer Cells | British Society for Immunology. https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/cells/natural-killer-cells

[3] Blood Cancer UK. Lymphoma. https://bloodcancer.org.uk/understanding-blood-cancer/lymphoma/

[4] Mayo Clinic (2024). Lymphoma – Symptoms and Causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/lymphoma/symptoms-causes/syc-20352638

[5] LLS (2025). Lymphoma Survival Rate By Age. https://lls.org/blog/lymphoma-diagnosis-survival-rate-age-prognosis-and-treatment

[6] Cancer Research UK (2012). Survival | Hodgkin Lymphoma | Cancer Research UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/hodgkin-lymphoma/survival

[7] Cancer Research UK (2011). Survival | non-Hodgkin lymphoma | Cancer Research UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/non-hodgkin-lymphoma/survival

[8] Nieto, Y., et al. (2025). Allogeneic NK cells with a bispecific innate cell engager in refractory relapsed lymphoma: a phase 1 trial. Nature Medicine. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03640-8

[9] Radhakrishnan Ramchandren (2012). Advances in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. The Oncologist, 17(3), pp.367–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0258

[10] Harrysson, S., et al. (2021). Incidence of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) including CNS relapse in a population-based cohort of 4243 patients in Sweden. Blood Cancer Journal, 11(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-00403-1

[11] Cleveland Clinic (2023). What are Cytokines? Types and Function. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/24585-cytokines

[12] Romee, R., et al. (2016). Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Science Translational Medicine, [online] 8(357), p.357ra123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2341


healthy_ageing-980x653-1.jpg

Getting older is not just about grey hair and wrinkles. The body can deteriorate, losing muscle tone and strength, making daily life activities more difficult and tiring. What’s more, the immune system also weakens, making older adults more likely to get sick and less able to fight off infection. Because of this, preventing or reversing the effects of ageing is the key to lifelong health. Although lifestyle changes and exercise can help offset some of these effects[1], researchers are increasingly looking at umbilical cord stem cells for their protective and restorative potential.

Protecting the immune system: the thymus and spleen 

The thymus and spleen are both part of the lymphatic system, which itself is part of the body’s immune system. The thymus is where a type of white blood cells, called T cells, fully mature; these cells control the body’s immune response and attack infected and cancerous cells. The spleen, on the other hand, mainly acts like a filter, removing old or damaged blood cells from the body. It also helps produce white blood cells and destroy bacteria and viruses.[2] Changes in the thymus and spleen during a person’s lifetime mean the immune system gradually becomes less effective, making the person more vulnerable to many illnesses, including infections and cancer.[3][4]

A recent study, performed on a mouse model of ageing, showed that mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord tissue (UCT-MSCs) could prevent ageing-related changes in the thymus and spleen. The study compared three groups of mice: a control group, an induced-ageing group which received no treatment, and an induced-ageing group which also received treatment with human UCT-MSCs. Upon analysis, the thymus and spleen in the UCT-MSC treatment group were found to more closely resemble those in the control group in size, structure, and potential functionality. Those in the ageing group with no treatment, on the other hand, were significantly atrophied. Moreover, mice in the UCT-MSC treatment group also showed lower levels of inflammation and oxidative stress, lower expression of ageing-related genes, and an improved population of beneficial bacteria in the digestive system.[5]

Strengthening muscles and easing frailty

Losing some muscle mass and strength is a natural part of ageing. In some people, however, the loss becomes so significant the muscles atrophy, a condition called age-related sarcopenia. This condition can make even the simplest task, such as getting out of chairs or climbing stairs, quite difficult. Sarcopenia can also be a complicating factor leading to frailty, which increases the risk of falls, broken bones, disability and death.[6][7] Here, too, UCT-MSCs could prove beneficial as a treatment.

A pre-clinical study conducted on mice, specifically on sarcopenia, found that treatment with human UCT-MSCs could counteract muscle ageing. Mice in the treatment group showed improvements in grip strength and performed better in a fatigue test compared to the group which received no treatment. Furthermore, muscle analysis and comparison between groups showed restored muscle functionality in the treatment group.[8]

A different, phase 1/2 clinical trial on elderly patients with diagnosed frailty reported similar results. The study was randomised and double-blinded, and aimed to test both the safety and the effectiveness of UCT-MSC treatment. After a first, baseline evaluation, patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment or the control group. Following two infusions of either UCT-MSCs or placebo at days 1 and 30, they were then evaluated with several follow-up visits over the course of six months. Compared to the control group, patients treated with UCT-MSCs showed improvements in general quality of life, grip strength and walking ability.[9]

Protecting the future, today

Although more research is definitely needed, studies such as these highlight the strong regenerative potential of stem cells from the umbilical cord.

Babies being born today could be part of the first generation to live beyond 100. Having access to their own umbilical cord stem cells could help them gain access to anti-ageing treatments and remain in good health.

To learn more about how to preserve this powerful resource for your baby, as well as more potential uses for umbilical cord and placenta stem cells, complete the form below to request your free guide.

References

[1] NHS England. Preventing frailty. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/clinical-policy/older-people/frailty/preventing-frailty/

[2] Cleveland Clinic (2023). Lymphatic System. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/21199-lymphatic-system

[3] Liang, Z., Dong, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q. and Zhao, Y. (2022). Age‐related thymic involution: Mechanisms and functional impact. Aging Cell, 21(8). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13671

[4] Turner, V.M. and Mabbott, N.A. (2017). Influence of ageing on the microarchitecture of the spleen and lymph nodes. Biogerontology, 18(5), pp.723–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-017-9707-7

[5] Xu, J., et al. (2025). Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve thymus and spleen functions in d-galactose-induced aged mice. Scientific Reports, 15(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94364-9

[6] von Haehling, S., Morley, J.E. and Anker, S.D. (2010). An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 1(2), pp.129–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13539-010-0014-2

[7] Mary Anne Dunkin (2022). Sarcopenia With Aging. WebMD. https://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/sarcopenia-with-aging

[8] Wang, C., et al. (2023). Clinical-grade human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells improved skeletal muscle dysfunction in age-associated sarcopenia mice. Cell Death and Disease, 14(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05843-8

[9] Zhu, Y., et al. (2024). Safety and efficacy of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of patients with aging frailty: a phase I/II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 15(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03707-2


doctor_showing_osteoarthritis-980x653-1.jpg

Osteoarthritis, a chronic degenerative joint disease, affects millions of people worldwide and is a leading cause of disability.[1][2] Currently available treatments can offer relief from pain and other symptoms. However, they fail to address the root of the disease, as they cannot effectively restore the damaged joint.[3] A novel stem cell therapy based on cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSCs) is now emerging as a promising regenerative approach. The therapy, called Cartistem, has been shown to regenerate strong, elastic cartilage in the joint, rather than the fibrous, weaker cartilage created by an alternative treatment.[4]

What is osteoarthritis? 

Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent form of arthritis, and primarily affects middle-aged and older adults. It involves the deterioration of the cartilage that protects the ends of bones within a joint. Because cartilage does not contain blood vessels, it has a limited ability to self-repair[5]; with continued deterioration, it disappears entirely, leading to damage and changes to the bones themselves. Symptoms include joint stiffness and pain, as well as reduced range of motion, and can increase over time. Eventually, they can become severe enough to make day-to-day activities more difficult.[1][6]

The risk of osteoarthritis increases with age, although there are other risk factors which can contribute. These include joint injuries, overuse of the joint in work or sports, obesity and genetics.[1] Osteoarthritis can affect any joint in the body, but most frequently appears in the hands, knees, hips and spine.[1] Knee osteoarthritis, in particular, often involves both knees. It can cause pain during walking, especially going uphill or downhill, as well as difficulty straightening the legs and a sensation of the knee “giving way”.[7]

Treatments for knee osteoarthritis

The current standard of care for knee osteoarthritis includes a range of treatments that aim to manage pain, reduce stiffness and improve range of motion. They include both surgical and non-surgical options.

Non-surgical treatment is typically tried at first. This includes pain medication as well as lifestyle changes, such as weight loss and exercise, and assistive devices, such as special footwear, braces, or walking aids.[8][9] If non-surgical treatments have not been effective or the patient’s daily life is seriously affected, doctors then look at surgical treatments. This could be an operation called an osteotomy, where a small section of bone on one side of the joint is removed to realign the joint and shift weight away from damaged parts of the cartilage.[10] Knee replacement, either partial or total, is also an option.[8][9]

Another possibility is a surgical treatment called microfracture or microdrilling. This treatment involves doctors making small holes into the surface of the bone where cartilage is absent. The holes cause blood and bone marrow to coat the surface of the bone, then forming into a clot. Thanks to the stem cells contained in blood and bone marrow, this clot eventually develops into a new layer of cartilage.[11] However, this new cartilage is not as strong as the original cartilage, and can break down more easily,[5][12] meaning any improvement is temporary.

A new therapeutic option

Cartistem is an off-the-shelf stem cell therapy developed in South Korea, where it has been approved for knee osteoarthritis treatment since 2012.[13] It consists of a combination of allogeneic UCB-MSCs and hyaluronic acid hydrogel. Applied to the area of damaged cartilage during surgery, the stem cells stimulate cartilage regeneration.[14]

Although Cartistem can be considered comparable to microdrilling in terms of the underlying process, a recent study has shown that this therapy can regenerate cartilage that is stronger and more resilient. The study, the results of which were recently presented at the 2025 annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, directly compared the results of Cartistem to those of microdrilling.[4]

According to researchers, Cartistem repaired a greater surface area than microdrilling, producing stronger cartilage which contained more collagen and had improved stiffness and elasticity. In contrast, microdrilling produced weaker, more fibrous cartilage, and in one out of five patients resulted in no cartilage regeneration at all.[14]

On the strength of the results from this and other studies, the FDA granted approval to proceed directly to a phase 3 clinical trial in the United States. A phase 3 trial is also underway in Japan.[4]

The regenerative power of cord blood stem cells

The strong potential of UCB-MSCs for the treatment of osteoarthritis is well-documented, with several recent studies highlighting their positive effects.[15][16][17]

Cartistem is a proprietary, off-the-shelf therapy, using allogeneic (donor) UCB-MSCs. However, as therapies are still being discovered and developed, it is entirely possible that a patient having access to their own cord blood stem cells could make the difference in terms of effectiveness. This could be the case not only for osteoarthritis, but for also for many other illnesses and diseases.

To discover more about cord blood stem cells, and how you could preserve them for your baby for potential future treatment, fill in the form below to request your free guide to cord blood banking.

References

[1] Mayo Clinic (2021). Osteoarthritis. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/osteoarthritis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351925

[2] Neogi, T. (2013). The Epidemiology and Impact of Pain in Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21(9), pp.1145–1153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018

[3] Mayo Clinic (2021). Osteoarthritis – Diagnosis and treatment – Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/osteoarthritis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351930

[4] Ji-hye, K. (2025). MEDIPOST’s stem cell therapy regenerates stronger cartilage than microdrilling, clears path to US phase 3. KBR. https://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=26972

[5] Tuan, R.S., Chen, A.F. and Klatt, B.A. (2013). Cartilage Regeneration. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 21(5), pp.303–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-21-05-303

[6] Johns Hopkins Medicine (2024). Osteoarthritis. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/arthritis/osteoarthritis

[7] NHS (2019). Symptoms – Osteoarthritis. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/osteoarthritis/symptoms/

[8] NHS (2023). Treatment – Osteoarthritis. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/osteoarthritis/treatment/

[9] Cleveland Clinic (2021). Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Symptoms, Causes and Treatments. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21750-osteoarthritis-knee

[10] Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Osteotomy (Bone Cutting): What It Is, Procedure & Recovery. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/22688-osteotomy

[11] Royal Orthopaedic Hospital. Microfracture/Chondroplasty of the Knee. https://roh.nhs.uk/services-information/knees/microfracture-chondroplasty-of-the-knee

[12] MedlinePlus. Knee microfracture surgery: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/007255.htm

[13] MEDIPOST. (2022). CARTISTEM®. https://en.medi-post.co.kr/cartistem/

[14] Jung, S., et al. (2024). Implantation of hUCB‐MSCs generates greater hyaline‐type cartilage than microdrilling combined with high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 32(4), pp.829–842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12100

[15] Jung, S.-H., et al. (2024). Allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation versus microdrilling combined with high tibial osteotomy for cartilage regeneration. Scientific Reports, [online] 14(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53598-9

[16] Zhang, P., Dong, B., Yuan, P. and Li, X. (2023). Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promoting knee joint chondrogenesis for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), p.639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04131-7

[17] Prodromos, C., Finkle, S., Rumschlag, T. and Lotus, J. (2020). Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment is Consistently Effective for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: The Results of a Systematic Review of Treatment and Comparison to a Placebo Group. Medicines, 7(8), p.42. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines7080042


cell-therapy-for-cerebral-palsy-980x588-1.jpg

A new study on cell therapy for cerebral palsy has, for the first time, directly compared the efficacy of two different treatments. Although more research is needed, the study’s results offer valuable insights for future clinical trials tackling this challenging disorder.

The challenges of cell therapy for cerebral palsy 

Over the past two decades, cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for cerebral palsy. In particular, mononuclear cells from cord blood (UCB-MNCs) and mesenchymal stem cells from cord tissue (UCT-MSCs) have proven to be a safe and effective therapy. Many clinical trials have obtained results showing improvements in patients’ motor function through these cells’ anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and regenerative properties.

However, efforts to pinpoint the best treatment method have been stymied by significant variations in trial parameters. Differences from study to study can include the type and severity of cerebral palsy, the age of the patients, the cell type, dose and delivery method, whether the study is open-label or blinded, and even the methods and time periods used to monitor improvement. Consequently, no two studies are alike, and results cannot be directly compared.[1][2]

Study methods and goal

The new study, conducted in Iran, is a pooled analysis of the results of two studies, one on UCB-MNTs and one on UCT-MSCs. Both studies were conducted in the same research centre; moreover, to aid in the comparison, the research methodology and other variables were kept the same as much as possible.[3][4][5]

The study patients were aged 4-14 and had spastic cerebral palsy with white matter lesions. After eligibility screening, 108 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms or a control group. Treatment was done via intrathecal (into the spinal fluid) injection, with the control group receiving a sham procedure instead. Researchers then assessed patients’ motor function, quality of life, disability and spasticity after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Both individual studies were double-blinded. Furthermore, all statistical analysis, both for individual studies and for the final pooled comparison, was performed by a blinded statistician.

The individual studies aimed to confirm that UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs are a safe and effective treatment for cerebral palsy. Following that, the pooled study analysis compared the effects of the UCB-MNC treatment to those of the UCT-MSC treatment across the study period.

Study results

Both the UCB-MNC treatment and the UCT-MSC treatment reported positive results over time when compared to the control group. Patients in both groups showed improvement in gross motor function and quality of life, as well as reduction in disability and spasticity.[4][5]

A graph showing outcomes of cell therapy for cerebral palsy.
Figure 1. A comparison graph of the two different treatment groups and the control group.[3]

As the figure above shows, researchers found that the UCB-MNC treatment group showed stronger improvements in motor function early on. However, both the UCB-MNC and UCT-MSC groups achieved the same level of improvement at 6 months post treatment. At twelve months after treatment, there was some gradual deterioration of the improvements; however, researchers noted that UCT-MSCs did seem to result in more sustainable changes, with patients seeing less deterioration compared to the UCB-MNC group.[3]

Due to this deterioration, researchers posit that repeated doses at regular intervals may be the best route to continued improvement.[1] They also suggest that future trials should investigate treatments combining both UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs, as it may prove more effective than individual ones.[3]

The future of medicine

Researchers stress that this study is only a start, and further comparative trials and research are needed. Although both UCB-MNCs and UCT-MSCs offer positive results, there is still no certainty on which cell type and source will prove most effective treatment. This is true not only for cerebral palsy, but also for other illnesses and diseases for which an effective treatment is still being sought.

This uncertainty highlights the importance of comprehensive stem cell banking. By storing as many stem cell sources as possible, you could equip your baby and family with the broadest range of options for future regenerative therapies.

To find out how you could preserve both cord blood and tissue, along with amnion and placenta, for your baby’s potential future use, fill in the form below to request your free guide.

References

[1] Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood. (2025). Cerebral Palsy Response to Cell Therapy as a Function of Time. https://parentsguidecordblood.org/en/news/cerebral-palsy-response-cell-therapy-function-time

[2] Qu, J., et al. (2022). Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1006845

[3] Nouri, M., et al. (2025). Cell-Based Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Puzzle in Progress. PubMed, 26(9), pp.569–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2024.2032098.1600

[4] Amanat, M., et al. (2021). Clinical and imaging outcomes after intrathecal injection of umbilical cord tissue mesenchymal stem cells in cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 12(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02513-4.

[5] Zarrabi, M., et al. (2022). The safety and efficacy of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. BMC Neurology, 22(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02636-y.


amnion_graft_eye_injury-980x653-1.jpg

After an acid attack that “melted” his left eye, Paul Laskey thought he would lose his sight entirely. Now, a series of amnion grafts from a donated placenta has saved his eye, stabilising it and preventing further damage.[1]

A long road to recovery

Mr Laskey, from Newcastle, had acid squirted over his face after confronting a mugger, in February 2023. After he was rushed to hospital, doctors found that the chemical burn had, in effect, “melted” his left eye. The inner and outer layers of his cornea both suffered severe damage; the burn had caused limbal stem cell failure and severe neurotrophic keratopathy. In other words, the eye couldn’t repair or regenerate the cells within the cornea. Furthermore, the eye nerves didn’t work correctly.[2]

Doctors feared Mr Laskey would lose his eye entirely. First, they began by cleaning the eye, removing any remnants of the acid that might have still been there.[3] Then, over the following eight months, Mr Laskey underwent several surgeries, including two cornea transplants.

He also received three amnion grafts to stabilise his eye and help it heal, stopping his sight from deteriorating further. The first graft was a week after the attack, and the last more than a year later, in June 2024.[4]

Amnion grafts and eye injury

Amnion grafts are made from placenta – more specifically, from the amniotic membrane, the thin membrane on the inner side of the placenta which forms the amniotic sac. The amnion has anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring properties.[5]

Mothers who deliver via elective C-section at specific hospitals can choose to donate their placenta to NHS Blood & Transplant.[6] Scientists then use these to create specialised tissue grafts – between 50 and 100 from each donated placenta. These grafts are used to treat eye injuries, as well as burns and wounds.[3]

Ophthalmologist prof. Francisco Figueredo, who treated Mr Laskey, said that amnion grafts have been essential in helping the management of his severe eye burn.[3] Having saved his eye and preserved the vision he still has, doctors are now hoping to restore more of his eyesight through stem cell treatment.[1]

The future of placental therapy

Paul Laskey’s story unquestionably highlights the remarkable potential of the placenta and amnion. In addition to treatment for eye injuries, amnion grafts have also helped to save limbs from amputation and aided in facial reconstruction.

Although the regenerative properties of the amniotic membrane have been known for some time, research continues to explore the possible uses of the placenta and its components. Undoubtedly, only time will tell what other potentially life-saving treatments it could be used for.

Amnion patches, for instance, have been used to treat patients with inflammatory heart conditions[7]. Researchers have also used mesenchymal stem cells from the amniotic membrane to 3D print muscles, bone fragments, and even ears[8]. The placenta itself is also rich in mesenchymal stem cells, which are being studied to treat illnesses ranging from Crohn’s disease[9] to osteoarthritis[10].

To learn more about the potential uses of the placenta and other birth tissues, and how you could preserve them for your baby and family’s use in years to come, fill in the form below to receive your free guide.

References

[1] Barbour, S. (2025). Newcastle man’s eye saved with help of placenta after acid attack. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r5zz3yp0go

[2] Harwood-Baynes, M. (2025). Battery acid attack victim reveals how donated placenta treatment saved his eye. Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/battery-acid-attack-victim-reveals-how-donated-placenta-treatment-saved-his-eye-13312465

[3] Pickover, E. (2025). Donated placenta saves acid attack victim’s eye. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/acid-attack-eye-placenta-transplant-b2700916.html

[4] Alsford, L. (2025). Man used woman’s placenta to re-build his eye after acid attack. Metro. https://metro.co.uk/2025/02/20/man-used-womans-placenta-re-build-eye-save-sight-acid-attack-22579732/

[5] Cleveland Clinic. Amniotic Membrane: Anatomy, Function & Conditions. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/amniotic-membrane

[6] NHS Blood and Transplant. (2025). Living amniotic membrane/placenta donation programme. https://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/what-we-do/transplantation-services/tissue-and-eye-services/tissue-donation/become-a-donor/living-amniotic-membraneplacenta-donation-programme/

[7] Marsh, K.M. et al. (2017). Anti-inflammatory properties of amniotic membrane patch following pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 12(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0567-7

[8] Kang, H.-W., Lee, S.J., Ko, I.K., Kengla, C., Yoo, J.J. and Atala, A. (2016). A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nature Biotechnology, 34(3), pp.312–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413

[9] Jung Pyo Lee, Jung, J., Lee, H., Su Jin Jeong, Kyung Hwa Cho, Seong Ju Hwang and Gi Beom Kim (2012). Comparison of immunomodulatory effects of placenta mesenchymal stem cells with bone marrow and adipose mesenchymal stem cells. 13(2), pp.219–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2012.03.024

[10] Khalifeh Soltani, et al. (2019). Safety and efficacy of allogenic placental mesenchymal stem cells for treating knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Cytotherapy, [online] 21(1), pp.54–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.11.003


acute_lymphoblastic_leukaemia-980x873-1.jpg

A CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia[1] has recently been approved by the FDA for use in clinical trials in the United States. The therapy is based on cells derived from allogeneic (donor) umbilical cord blood; it is the very first such treatment to gain FDA approval.[2]

What is acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? 

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, or ALL, is a type of blood cancer that starts in the bone marrow. It affects white blood cells (lymphocytes).

In ALL, the bone marrow makes too many of the cells from which lymphocytes derive (lymphoblasts). These lymphoblasts grow and divide quickly; however, they are not fully developed and cannot turn into healthy lymphocytes.

As a result, lymphoblasts build up in the bone marrow and stop all types of healthy blood cells from developing. They may also spread into other parts of the body, including lymph nodes, the liver and spleen, and the brain and spinal cord.[3]

The lack of healthy white blood cells means ALL patients are at a higher risk of infection. ALL can also cause anaemia through the lack of red blood cells, as well as bleeding problems due to lower platelet numbers.[4]

Leukaemia is the most common type of cancer which affects children; of all types of leukaemia, ALL is the most commonly diagnosed in children.[4] It can also affect adults, although this is less common.[3]

What is CAR-T cell therapy?

CAR-T therapy is a type of treatment which uses T cells to fight cancerous cells. The T cells are genetically modified using a viral vector to add a specific protein on their surface, called a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). This addition makes them able to recognise cancerous cells and destroy them.[5]

In standard CAR-T therapy, the T cells used are the patient’s own, extracted from the blood through a process called apheresis. After extraction, they are taken to a specialised lab to be modified. However, this process is very time-consuming, typically requiring three to five weeks for manufacturing and quality checking. This can be a problem in the case of ALL, as the disease is fast-progressing and could worsen before the CAR-T cells are ready to be reinfused.[6]

What makes this new therapy different?

The new therapy uses T cells derived from allogeneic (someone else’s) cord blood as a starting point instead. These cells are in a more naïve state, meaning they have a higher ability for self-renewal and lower immunogenicity. This means a lower chance to provoke an immune response when used in treatment. As a result, they can be developed into an ‘off-the-shelf’ CAR-T therapy that is ready when needed and does not require a long wait.[2] Following positive results from investigator-initiated trials,[1] the FDA has now approved the therapy for clinical trials in the United States.[2] Furthermore, researchers in China are also testing the therapy in a clinical trial for the treatment of lupus.[7][8]

A similar therapy, also based on T cells derived from donor cord blood, is being developed at the Fondazione Tettamanti research centre in Monza, Italy. Using a special DNA sequence called a transposon, scientists turn the T cells into CAR-enabled cytokine-induced killer cells (CARCIK), making them able to destroy cancer cells. An initial set of clinical trials aimed at determining the feasibility and safety of this treatment showed positive results. Researchers are now continuing to test the therapy in clinical trials for ALL as well as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and in vitro and animal models for acute myeloid leukaemia.[9]

The benefits of using cord blood for treatments

Being able to derive T cells for CAR treatment from cord blood could pave the way towards more targeted therapies in the future, says Sarah Tettamanti, a researcher at Fondazione Tettamanti. These therapies could be developed from banked cord blood compatible with each specific patient.[9]

For treatments such as these, it could be essential to have ready access to a compatible donor match. Public cord blood banks are available in the UK and worldwide. However, because they rely on donated cords from only a small number of hospitals[10], there is no guarantee that a match will be found when needed.

Conversely, if you store your baby’s cord blood privately at birth, they will always have access to their own perfect match if they ever need it. There is also a 25% chance for the cord blood to be a perfect match for a sibling and 50% chance of a partial match. It is guaranteed to always be a partial match for parents.

It could also prove to be a match for a more distant relative – which thanks to cord blood cells’ naïve state and lower immunogenicity, could still be enough for treatment.

To learn more about the potential uses of cord blood in treatments and how you could preserve this precious resource for your baby and family, fill in the form below and request our free guide.

References

[1] LemanBio (2023). Leman Biotech and Ucello Therapeutics enter into Comprehensive Strategic Collaboration to Advance Universal CAR-T Development. https://www.lemanbio.com/en/news/197.html

[2] BusinessWire. (2025). VectorBuilder Powers FDA IND Approval of World’s First Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Allogeneic CAR-T Product. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250129313138/en/VectorBuilder-Powers-FDA-IND-Approval-of-World%E2%80%99s-First-Umbilical-Cord-Blood-Derived-Allogeneic-CAR-T-Product

[3] Cancer Research UK (2021). What Is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)? https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/acute-lymphoblastic-leukaemia-all/about

[4] Cancer Research UK (2021). About childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/childrens-cancer/acute-lymphoblastic-leukaemia/about

[5] Cancer Research UK (2021). CAR T-cell therapy. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/treatment/immunotherapy/types/CAR-T-cell-therapy

[6] Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy. https://www.lls.org/treatment/types-treatment/immunotherapy/chimeric-antigen-receptor-car-t-cell-therapy

[7] https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/t7tQTUwpl5vmr78cSRXGhQ

[8] https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/rVx9bVuU3-2pKio_LbO7ZQ

[9] Cerati, F. (2025). Dal cordone ombelicale le cellule modificate per trattare la leucemia. Il Sole 24 Ore. https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/dal-cordone-ombelicale-cellule-modificate-trattare-leucemia-AGD2eidC

[10] Cord Blood Bank – NHS Blood and Transplant. Where can you donate? https://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/cord-blood-bank/donate/where-can-you-donate/


stroke_in_the_brain-980x918-1.jpg

A recent study has found that a stem cell therapy could reduce epileptic symptoms after stroke and help the brain recover. The study was performed at the Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease in California, USA, using a rat model of stroke.

Stroke basics

A stroke is a medical condition which causes the death of cells in the brain. This, in turn, stops the brain from working properly. There are two main types of stroke: haemorrhagic, caused by bleeding in the brain, and ischemic, caused by the blockage of a blood vessel. Ischemic stroke is by far the most common, accounting for just under 90% of strokes.[1]

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and one of the major causes of disability worldwide.[2] In the UK, it is the single biggest cause of severe disability, causing a range greater than any other condition, including movement issues, visual problems, and speech difficulties.[3]

The goal of the study

The stem cell therapy tested in the study is based on mesenchymal stem cells derived from donor bone marrow. It has already been successful in clinical trials for improving chronic paralysis after traumatic brain injury[4][5]; this led to its approval as a treatment for this issue in Japan[6].

Now, researchers are hoping it could also help reverse brain damage caused by stroke. In particular, they are focusing on brain hyperexcitability, which is a flawed response in the brain that develops in some people after they have had a stroke.

What is brain hyperexcitability?

Put simply, brain hyperexcitability is an increased chance for neurons to activate in response to a specific stimulus. In the case of stroke, this flawed response develops in the brain as it tries to make up for lost functions.

These overly active neurons send out signals that are too frequent or too strong to other regions of the brain. This, in turn, causes serious issues. Brain hyperexcitability can make it difficult to control muscles (spasticity) and can lead to seizures.[7] This means stroke is a leading cause of acquired epilepsy,[8] particularly in people over the age of 35.[9]

Unfortunately, brain hyperexcitability remains not well understood, and there is no treatment available to prevent it[7]. Post-stroke seizures and epilepsy are simply managed, as and when needed, with anti-epileptic drugs.[10]

Study process and findings

Researchers tested the stem cell therapy in a rat model of stroke. A month after rats had a stroke, modified human stem cells were injected into their brains, near the damaged area.

The team then measured electrical activity in the brain to determine the effectiveness of the therapy. Furthermore, they also analysed the structure of the brain and blood cells in detail, so they could study the changes wrought by the stroke and by the therapy.

They found that the stroke had caused hyperexcitability in the rats’ brains. The stem cell therapy, however, had reversed this, returning the brain to normal function. Furthermore, a number of proteins and cells that are important for brain function had also increased.

Additionally, by comparing rats which had received the therapy to control rats, researchers identified molecules in the blood that had changed after the stroke. They further saw that these same molecules were restored to normal by the therapy. Additional analysis found that a week after the transplant, few stem cells remained in the rats’ brain; however, the effects were long-lasting.

Hope for future treatment

This therapy is in the very early stages of research; it remains to be determined whether the reversal of brain hyperexcitability would lead to a reduction of symptoms in actual patients.

Still, studies like these highlight the tremendous regenerative potential of stem cells, and the hope they can offer for the treatment of illnesses and injuries that today are considered incurable.

Today, stroke occurs more than 100,000 times per year in the UK – about once every five minutes. Advances in immediate treatment have meant that the number of patients dying from stroke continues to decrease. Unfortunately, however, rehabilitation hasn’t kept pace, and the number of people living with severe disabilities after stroke continues to increase.[3]

Stem cell therapies for post-stroke disability could prove to be truly lifechanging.

Some of the most potent stem cells that could be used in regenerative therapy come your baby’s umbilical cord and placenta. Both of these are normally thrown away at birth – but they could instead be stored for your baby’s future use. If you want to find out more about this rich source of stem cells, and learn how you could preserve it, fill out the form below to download our free parent’s guide.

References

[1] National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (2023). Stroke – What Is a Stroke? https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/stroke

[2] Katan, M. and Luft, A. (2018). Global Burden of Stroke. Seminars in Neurology, [online] 38(02), pp.208–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503

[3] Brain Research UK (2021). Stroke – Neurological condition. https://www.brainresearchuk.org.uk/neurological-conditions/stroke

[4] Kawabori, M. et al. (2021). Cell Therapy for Chronic TBI. Neurology, 96(8), pp.e1202–e1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000011450

[5] Okonkwo, D.O. et al. (2024). Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Implants for Chronic Motor Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Neurology, [online] 103(7), p.e209797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209797

[6] Neuro Central. (2024). SanBio Obtains Marketing Approval for ‘AKUUGO® Suspension for Intracranial Implantation’ (INN: Vandefitemcel) as a Therapeutic Agent for Improving Chronic Motor Paralysis From Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). https://www.neuro-central.com/sanbio-obtains-marketing-approval-for-akuugo-suspension-for-intracranial-implantation-inn-vandefitemcel-as-a-therapeutic-agent-for-improving-chronic-motor-paralysis-from-tra/

[7] Klein, B. et al. (2024). Modified human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells restore cortical excitability after focal ischemic stroke in rats. Molecular Therapy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.12.006

[8] Adhikari, Y., Ma, C.-G., Chai, Z. and Jin, X. (2023). Preventing development of post-stroke hyperexcitability by optogenetic or pharmacological stimulation of cortical excitatory activity. Neurobiology of Disease, 184, p.106233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106233

[9] Mayo Clinic (2021). Epilepsy – Symptoms and Causes. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/epilepsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20350093

[10] Holtkamp, M., Beghi, E., Benninger, F., Kälviäinen, R., Rocamora, R. and Christensen, H. (2017). European Stroke Organisation guidelines for the management of post-stroke seizures and epilepsy. European Stroke Journal, 2(2), pp.103–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987317705536


anatomical_heart_model-980x551-1.jpg

Scientists have shown that muscle patches grown from stem cells can be used to strengthen and help repair a failing heart. In a breakthrough clinical trial, ten patches containing 400 million cells were implanted on the heart of a 46-year-old woman who was suffering from heart failure. The results, along with results from earlier studies which tested the same procedure in monkeys, have been published in Nature[1]

What is heart failure?

Heart failure is when the heart is too weak or stiff and, as a result, cannot pump blood around the body as well as it should. It can have a variety of causes, from heart disease and heart attacks to high blood pressure and inflammation.[2][3]

Heart failure is a long-term condition which gradually gets worse over time. Currently, it is considered an incurable condition; it can only be treated to keep the symptoms under control with medication and, sometimes, surgery. In severe cases of heart failure, a heart transplant may be necessary. However, there is a shortage of hearts for transplantation, so patients may have to wait several years before one becomes available.[4]

Development of the therapy

The team of researchers, led by Prof. Zimmermann from University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany, coaxed stem cells to grow into heart muscle and connective tissue cells. They then mixed these cells with collagen gel to create patches which could be applied to the outside surface of the heart using a minimally invasive surgery.

After initial studies in vitro and in small animal models of heart failure confirmed the treatment had potential, the patches were first tested in monkeys. The team implanted the patches into six rhesus macaques with heart failure. Three of the monkeys received two patches, while the other three received five. These monkeys were also all treated with immunosuppressive drugs. A second group of seven monkeys remained untreated as a control.

The implanted cells remained smaller than the monkeys’ own heart muscle cells. However, the patches led to an improvement in heart function compared to the control monkeys, thickening the heart’s muscle and increasing its pumping power.[5]

First in-human trial

The success of the trial in monkeys led to the approval of a first-in-human phase 1/2 trial, called BioVAT-HF, which began in 2021 and is currently ongoing.[6][7][8]

The trial has so far recruited 19 patients. The first of these, a 46-year-old woman, had severe heart failure and was waiting for a heart transplant.[1] The researcher team implanted the muscle patches on her heart; she also received immunosuppressive drugs of the same type normally used for transplants. Three months later, the patient was lucky enough to be the recipient of a successful heart transplant.

Upon analysis of her old heart, scientists found that the implanted patches had survived and had formed blood vessels. In other words, they had integrated with the heart without any side effects.

The therapy is still in the early stages of research, and Zimmermann is very clear that it is not yet a replacement for a heart transplant. Rather, it is a supportive treatment for patients in advanced stages of heart failure, who are waiting for a transplant and are under palliative care.

Still, these are incredibly exciting results, which could prove to be a game-changer for the treatment of heart failure. The research team is continuing the clinical trial. In addition, they are testing new patch designs in monkeys in hopes of minimising the need for immunosuppressive drugs.

Stem cells: the future of medicine

This study is one more example of how stem cells are shaping research through their applications in regenerative medicine.

The stem cells used in this particular clinical trial are allogeneic (donor) induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). When receiving a donor transplant, there is always a risk of rejection, hence the need for immunosuppressive drugs.

Your baby’s umbilical cord is a rich source of stem cells, among the most naïve and potent your baby will ever have. They could be used for similar therapies in the future, should your baby need them. What’s more, they could be used without risk of rejection: they are your baby’s own cells, their own perfect genetic match.

You only get one opportunity to collect and store these cells: in the 15 minutes after your baby is born. To find out more about how you can preserve this precious resource, fill in the form below to request your free guide to cord blood banking.

References

[1] Naddaf, M. (2025). ‘Breakthrough’ stem-cell patches strengthened a woman’s failing heart. Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00273-2

[2] NHS (2022). Heart failure. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/heart-failure/

[3] Mayo Clinic (2023). Heart failure. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-failure/symptoms-causes/syc-20373142

[4] NHS (2022). Treatment – Heart Failure. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/heart-failure/treatment/

[5] Jebran, A.-F., et al. (2025). Engineered heart muscle allografts for heart repair in primates and humans. Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08463-0

[6] Dzhk.de. (2024). Safety and Efficacy of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Engineered Human Myocardium as Biological Ventricular Assist Tissue in Terminal Heart Failure (BioVAT-DZHK20). https://dzhk.de/en/research/clinical-research/dzhk-studies/study/detail/biovathfdzhk20

[7] Gavenis, K., University Medical Center Goettingen, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), University Medical Center Freiburg and Repairon GmbH (2023). Safety and Efficacy of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Engineered Human Myocardium as Biological Ventricular Assist Tissue in Terminal Heart Failure. clinicaltrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04396899

[8] Dzhk.de. (2025). DZHK-Studie BioVAT-HF-DZHK20. https://biovat.dzhk.de